This
On 10/4/14 2:00 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 09:07:22PM -0500, Wei Huang wrote:
Hi Paolo and Gleb,
The attached file is a preliminary version of AMD vPMU support for KVM.
Currently I am working on a formal patch set; but realized that there are
some design choice t
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 09:07:22PM -0500, Wei Huang wrote:
> Hi Paolo and Gleb,
>
> The attached file is a preliminary version of AMD vPMU support for KVM.
> Currently I am working on a formal patch set; but realized that there are
> some design choice to make (see below). I thought it is bet
(if-else forest is daunting.)
I think this approach is quite acceptable, except that there will be many
if-else in the code. Not clean enough.
(b) Convert intel-pmu.c => vmx.c and convert amd-pmu.c => svm.c
* PMU function pointers will be created in kvm_x86_ops;
* The entry functions will be c
2014-09-30 21:07-0500, Wei Huang:
> Hi Paolo and Gleb,
> 2. CURRENT DESIGN
> The design is similar to existing vPMU support. Many data structures such as
> "struct kvm_pmc" and "struct kvm_pmu" are re-used for this design.
>
> Original pmu.c code was designed with Intel PMU in mind. To avoid the
>
Hi Paolo and Gleb,
The attached file is a preliminary version of AMD vPMU support for KVM.
Currently I am working on a formal patch set; but realized that there
are some design choice to make (see below). I thought it is better to
send it out now, asking for your comments before sending out pa
