On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 07:26:35PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>> So I may send a pull request against 3.9 with the 3 commits that already
> >>> are in kvm/next?
> >>
> >> If you decide that the fixes are important enough to justify the
> >> existance of duplicate commits, i don't see a probl
On 12.04.2013, at 22:56, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 12.04.2013, at 22:54, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 03:50:13PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11.04.2013, at 15:45, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:59:04PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wro
On 12.04.2013, at 22:54, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 03:50:13PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 11.04.2013, at 15:45, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:59:04PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:33:12AM +0200, Gleb Nata
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 03:50:13PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 11.04.2013, at 15:45, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:59:04PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:33:12AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:35:09AM +01
On 11.04.2013, at 15:45, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:59:04PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:33:12AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:35:09AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
I agree. So if it doesn't hurt to have the sa
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:59:04PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:33:12AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:35:09AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> > > I agree. So if it doesn't hurt to have the same commits in kvm/next and
> > > kvm/master, I'd be
On 03/31/2013 06:05:40 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 31.03.2013, at 12:49, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:37:42AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 03/25/2013 08:33:12 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:35:09AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 26.03.20
On 31.03.2013, at 12:49, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:37:42AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 03/25/2013 08:33:12 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:35:09AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 26.03.2013, at 00:16, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 03/
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:37:42AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 03/25/2013 08:33:12 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:35:09AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>
> >> On 26.03.2013, at 00:16, Scott Wood wrote:
> >>
> >> > On 03/25/2013 05:59:39 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> >> O
On 03/25/2013 08:33:12 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:35:09AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 26.03.2013, at 00:16, Scott Wood wrote:
>
> > On 03/25/2013 05:59:39 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> On 25.03.2013, at 23:54, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> > On 03/25/2013 05:32:11 PM, Al
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:33:12AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:35:09AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> > I agree. So if it doesn't hurt to have the same commits in kvm/next and
> > kvm/master, I'd be more than happy to send another pull request with the
> > important fi
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:35:09AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 26.03.2013, at 00:16, Scott Wood wrote:
>
> > On 03/25/2013 05:59:39 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> On 25.03.2013, at 23:54, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> > On 03/25/2013 05:32:11 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> >> On 25.03.2013, at 2
On 26.03.2013, at 00:16, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 03/25/2013 05:59:39 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 25.03.2013, at 23:54, Scott Wood wrote:
>> > On 03/25/2013 05:32:11 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> >> On 25.03.2013, at 23:21, Scott Wood wrote:
>> >> > -next? These are bugfixes, at least partially
On 03/25/2013 05:59:39 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 25.03.2013, at 23:54, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 03/25/2013 05:32:11 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 25.03.2013, at 23:21, Scott Wood wrote:
>> > -next? These are bugfixes, at least partially for regressions
from 3.8 (that I pointed out before
On 25.03.2013, at 23:54, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 03/25/2013 05:32:11 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 25.03.2013, at 23:21, Scott Wood wrote:
>> > -next? These are bugfixes, at least partially for regressions from 3.8
>> > (that I pointed out before the bugs were merged!), that should go into
>>
On 03/25/2013 05:32:11 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 25.03.2013, at 23:21, Scott Wood wrote:
> -next? These are bugfixes, at least partially for regressions from
3.8 (that I pointed out before the bugs were merged!), that should go
into master.
>
> Also, what about:
> http://patchwork.ozla
On 25.03.2013, at 23:21, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 03/22/2013 09:25:56 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> Hi Marcelo / Gleb,
>> This is my current patch queue for ppc. Please pull.
>> Changes include:
>> - race-free in-kernel watchdog handling api
>> - e500 mmu fixes
>> Alex
>> The following changes si
On 03/22/2013 09:25:56 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Hi Marcelo / Gleb,
This is my current patch queue for ppc. Please pull.
Changes include:
- race-free in-kernel watchdog handling api
- e500 mmu fixes
Alex
The following changes since commit
2ae33b389601b86a3d0cfe2d09f5e3189d5322fd:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 03:25:56PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Hi Marcelo / Gleb,
>
> This is my current patch queue for ppc. Please pull.
>
> Changes include:
>
> - race-free in-kernel watchdog handling api
> - e500 mmu fixes
>
> Alex
>
Pulled, thanks.
>
> The following changes sinc
Hi Marcelo / Gleb,
This is my current patch queue for ppc. Please pull.
Changes include:
- race-free in-kernel watchdog handling api
- e500 mmu fixes
Alex
The following changes since commit 2ae33b389601b86a3d0cfe2d09f5e3189d5322fd:
Marcelo Tosatti (1):
Merge remote-tracking bra
20 matches
Mail list logo