Hi Christoffer,
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 01:10:15PM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 03:45:16PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Now that we have a dynamic means to register kvm_device_ops, use that
> > for the ARM VGIC, instead of relying on the static table.
> >
> > Cc: Gleb
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 03:45:16PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Now that we have a dynamic means to register kvm_device_ops, use that
> for the ARM VGIC, instead of relying on the static table.
>
> Cc: Gleb Natapov
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini
> Cc: Marc Zyngier
> Cc: Christoffer Dall
> Signed-off-by: W
On Wed, Jul 09 2014 at 5:05:20 pm BST, Paolo Bonzini
wrote:
> Il 01/07/2014 16:45, Will Deacon ha scritto:
>> Now that we have a dynamic means to register kvm_device_ops, use that
>> for the ARM VGIC, instead of relying on the static table.
>>
>> Cc: Gleb Natapov
>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini
>> Cc: Ma
Il 01/07/2014 16:45, Will Deacon ha scritto:
Now that we have a dynamic means to register kvm_device_ops, use that
for the ARM VGIC, instead of relying on the static table.
Cc: Gleb Natapov
Cc: Paolo Bonzini
Cc: Marc Zyngier
Cc: Christoffer Dall
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon
---
include/linux
Now that we have a dynamic means to register kvm_device_ops, use that
for the ARM VGIC, instead of relying on the static table.
Cc: Gleb Natapov
Cc: Paolo Bonzini
Cc: Marc Zyngier
Cc: Christoffer Dall
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon
---
include/linux/kvm_host.h | 1 -
virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c |
