On 02.07.2012, at 15:24, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 14:20 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> Ben, would you be opposed to a macro that does this? Open-coding
>> subtile details like this always makes me wary we could screw them
>> up :)
>
> That's definitely material
On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 14:20 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> Ben, would you be opposed to a macro that does this? Open-coding
> subtile details like this always makes me wary we could screw them
> up :)
That's definitely material for a macro (and fixup the gazillion places
where we do it by hand
On 22.06.2012, at 22:04, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> From: Liu Yu-B13201
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Yu
> [varun: 64-bit changes]
> Signed-off-by: Varun Sethi
> Signed-off-by: Stuart Yoder
> ---
> -v11:
> -added comment about origin of idle instruction sequence
> -update for 64-bit support found in
From: Liu Yu-B13201
Signed-off-by: Liu Yu
[varun: 64-bit changes]
Signed-off-by: Varun Sethi
Signed-off-by: Stuart Yoder
---
-v11:
-added comment about origin of idle instruction sequence
-update for 64-bit support found in testing
arch/powerpc/include/asm/epapr_hcalls.h | 11 +--
