On 02/13/2012 06:48 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:45:59PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
Instead of hunting misterious stalls/hungs all over the kernel when
overflow occurs at pvclock.c:pvclock_get_nsec_offset
u64 delta = native_read_tsc() - shadow->tsc_timestamp;
and
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:45:59PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> Instead of hunting misterious stalls/hungs all over the kernel when
> overflow occurs at pvclock.c:pvclock_get_nsec_offset
>
> u64 delta = native_read_tsc() - shadow->tsc_timestamp;
>
> and introducing hooks when places of unexp
Instead of hunting misterious stalls/hungs all over the kernel when
overflow occurs at pvclock.c:pvclock_get_nsec_offset
u64 delta = native_read_tsc() - shadow->tsc_timestamp;
and introducing hooks when places of unexpected access found, pv_clock
should be initialized for the calling cpu if o
