On 08.08.2012, at 05:31, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 12:57:14PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> The e500 target has lived without mmu notifiers ever since it got
>> introduced, but fails for the user space check on them with hugetlbfs.
>
> Ironically that user space check i
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 12:57:14PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> The e500 target has lived without mmu notifiers ever since it got
> introduced, but fails for the user space check on them with hugetlbfs.
Ironically that user space check isn't necessary any more since David
Gibson's fix for the hu
On 07.08.2012, at 16:14, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/07/2012 04:52 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
+/* MMU Notifiers */
+
+int kvm_unmap_hva(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long hva)
+{
+/* Is this a guest page? */
+if (!hva_to_memslot(kvm,
On 08/07/2012 04:52 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>> +/* MMU Notifiers */
>>> +
>>> +int kvm_unmap_hva(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long hva)
>>> +{
>>> +/* Is this a guest page? */
>>> +if (!hva_to_memslot(kvm, hva))
>>> +return 0;
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> +
On 07.08.2012, at 15:30, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/07/2012 01:57 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> The e500 target has lived without mmu notifiers ever since it got
>> introduced, but fails for the user space check on them with hugetlbfs.
>>
>> So in order to get that one working, implement mmu not
On 08/07/2012 01:57 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> The e500 target has lived without mmu notifiers ever since it got
> introduced, but fails for the user space check on them with hugetlbfs.
>
> So in order to get that one working, implement mmu notifiers in a
> reasonably dumb fashion and be happy. O
The e500 target has lived without mmu notifiers ever since it got
introduced, but fails for the user space check on them with hugetlbfs.
So in order to get that one working, implement mmu notifiers in a
reasonably dumb fashion and be happy. On embedded hardware, we almost
never end up with mmu not
