On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 01:41:40PM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> On Saturday 06 November 2010 08:24:51 Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 06:53:50PM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > > On Friday 05 November 2010 16:43:33 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 10:44:19AM +
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 11:18:34AM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> On Friday 05 November 2010 21:27:42 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 06:53:50PM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > > On Friday 05 November 2010 16:43:33 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 10:44:19AM
On Saturday 06 November 2010 08:24:51 Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 06:53:50PM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > On Friday 05 November 2010 16:43:33 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 10:44:19AM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > > > > > +};
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +T
On Friday 05 November 2010 21:27:42 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 06:53:50PM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > On Friday 05 November 2010 16:43:33 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 10:44:19AM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > > > > > +};
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 06:53:50PM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> On Friday 05 November 2010 16:43:33 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 10:44:19AM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > > > > +};
> > > > > +
> > > > > +This ioctl would enable in-kernel MSI-X emulation, which would
> > > > > h
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 08:01:53PM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > Go back to me if someone want to implement MSI device assignment on
> > big-endian machine.
>
> Sorry, just realized it's very likely that I don't have an big endian machine
> to
> test it even at that time...
>
> I think it's real
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 06:53:50PM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> On Friday 05 November 2010 16:43:33 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 10:44:19AM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > > > > +};
> > > > > +
> > > > > +This ioctl would enable in-kernel MSI-X emulation, which would
> > > > > h
On Friday 05 November 2010 18:53:50 Sheng Yang wrote:
> On Friday 05 November 2010 16:43:33 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 10:44:19AM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > > > > +};
> > > > > +
> > > > > +This ioctl would enable in-kernel MSI-X emulation, which would
> > > > > handle
On Friday 05 November 2010 16:51:33 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 03:16:23PM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > This patch enable per-vector mask for assigned devices using MSI-X.
> >
> > This patch provided two new APIs: one is for guest to specific device's
> > MSI-X table addres
On Friday 05 November 2010 16:43:33 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 10:44:19AM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > +This ioctl would enable in-kernel MSI-X emulation, which would
> > > > handle MSI-X +mask bit in the kernel.
> > >
> > > What happens on repeat
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 03:16:23PM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> This patch enable per-vector mask for assigned devices using MSI-X.
>
> This patch provided two new APIs: one is for guest to specific device's MSI-X
> table address in MMIO, the other is for userspace to get information about
> mask
>
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 10:44:19AM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +This ioctl would enable in-kernel MSI-X emulation, which would handle
> > > MSI-X +mask bit in the kernel.
> >
> > What happens on repeated calls when it's already enabled?
> > How does one disable after it's enab
This patch enable per-vector mask for assigned devices using MSI-X.
This patch provided two new APIs: one is for guest to specific device's MSI-X
table address in MMIO, the other is for userspace to get information about mask
bit.
All the mask bit operation are kept in kernel, in order to acceler
On Friday 05 November 2010 10:44:19 Sheng Yang wrote:
> On Thursday 04 November 2010 18:43:22 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 02:15:21PM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > > This patch enable per-vector mask for assigned devices using MSI-X.
> > >
> > > This patch provided two new
On Thursday 04 November 2010 18:43:22 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 02:15:21PM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > This patch enable per-vector mask for assigned devices using MSI-X.
> >
> > This patch provided two new APIs: one is for guest to specific device's
> > MSI-X table addr
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 02:15:21PM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> This patch enable per-vector mask for assigned devices using MSI-X.
>
> This patch provided two new APIs: one is for guest to specific device's MSI-X
> table address in MMIO, the other is for userspace to get information about
> mask
>
This patch enable per-vector mask for assigned devices using MSI-X.
This patch provided two new APIs: one is for guest to specific device's MSI-X
table address in MMIO, the other is for userspace to get information about mask
bit.
All the mask bit operation are kept in kernel, in order to acceler
17 matches
Mail list logo
