On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 07:44:27PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 03:38:57PM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 07:28:17PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 03:20:08PM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 03:38:57PM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 07:28:17PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 03:20:08PM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 08:10:24PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I think we shoul
Glauber Costa wrote:
we're not.
The issue happens exactly when the kvm modules are not loaded, then we're
failing
to initialize kvm. However, in the patch that raised this issue, I'm moving
KVM initialization to after this code path. And in qemu-kvm.git, kvm is
enabled-by-default. So tcg code w
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 07:28:17PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 03:20:08PM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 08:10:24PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > >
> > > I think we should simply resolves this the way upstream does: Do not
> > > start if modul
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 03:20:08PM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 08:10:24PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >
> > I think we should simply resolves this the way upstream does: Do not
> > start if modules are missing and -no-kvm is omitted - or even switch
> > over to -enable-kvm
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 08:10:24PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Glauber Costa wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:49:06PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> Glauber Costa wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 08:59:44PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>>
> Glauber Costa wrote:
>
>
Glauber Costa wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:49:06PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Glauber Costa wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 08:59:44PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>
Glauber Costa wrote:
> The goal is to get rid of the call to kvm_init. But those things
> are
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:49:06PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Glauber Costa wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 08:59:44PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
>>> Glauber Costa wrote:
>>>
The goal is to get rid of the call to kvm_init. But those things
are subtle, and often break. So d
Glauber Costa wrote:
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 08:59:44PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Glauber Costa wrote:
The goal is to get rid of the call to kvm_init. But those things
are subtle, and often break. So do it in a separate patch, to help
finding potential issues in future bisections.
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 08:59:44PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Glauber Costa wrote:
> > The goal is to get rid of the call to kvm_init. But those things
> > are subtle, and often break. So do it in a separate patch, to help
> > finding potential issues in future bisections.
>
> Found such an issued
Glauber Costa wrote:
> The goal is to get rid of the call to kvm_init. But those things
> are subtle, and often break. So do it in a separate patch, to help
> finding potential issues in future bisections.
Found such an issued: This patch triggers a segfault if no kvm modules
are loaded and you st
The goal is to get rid of the call to kvm_init. But those things
are subtle, and often break. So do it in a separate patch, to help
finding potential issues in future bisections.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa
---
vl.c | 18 +-
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
di
12 matches
Mail list logo