On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 17:18 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> If there are no assigned devices, the guest PAT are not providing
> any useful information and can be overridden to writeback; VMX
> always does this because it has the "IPAT" bit in its extended
> page table entries, but SVM does not have a
If there are no assigned devices, the guest PAT are not providing
any useful information and can be overridden to writeback; VMX
always does this because it has the "IPAT" bit in its extended
page table entries, but SVM does not have anything similar.
Hook into VFIO and legacy device assignment so
On 07/07/2015 17:22, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> > -#define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_NONCOHERENT_DMA
>> > +#define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_VFIO_HOOKS
> Do we really want to tie these two things together under something
> that's not strictly a "vfio" option? Legacy assignment also makes use
> of these, as shown in
On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 15:45 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> If there are no assigned devices, the guest PAT are not providing
> any useful information and can be overridden to writeback; VMX
> always does this because it has the "IPAT" bit in its extended
> page table entries, but SVM does not have a
If there are no assigned devices, the guest PAT are not providing
any useful information and can be overridden to writeback; VMX
always does this because it has the "IPAT" bit in its extended
page table entries, but SVM does not have anything similar.
Hook into VFIO and legacy device assignment so