On 03/11/2015 10:40, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 11/02/15 10:32, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 31/10/2015 20:50, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek
>>
>> Thanks Laszlo, I applied patches 1 and 2 (since your "part 2" never was :)).
>>
>> Paolo
>>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Since you can rebas
On 11/02/15 10:32, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 31/10/2015 20:50, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek
>
> Thanks Laszlo, I applied patches 1 and 2 (since your "part 2" never was :)).
>
> Paolo
>
Thanks.
Since you can rebase the queue freely, can you please also add:
Reported-by
On 31/10/2015 20:50, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek
Thanks Laszlo, I applied patches 1 and 2 (since your "part 2" never was :)).
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On 10/30/15 16:36, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> This series bases on "KVM: x86: fix RSM into 64-bit protected mode,
> round 2" and reverts it in [3/3]. To avoid regressions after doing so,
> [1/2] introduces a helper that is used in [2/2] to hopefully get the
> same behavior.
>
> I'll set up test enviro
This series bases on "KVM: x86: fix RSM into 64-bit protected mode,
round 2" and reverts it in [3/3]. To avoid regressions after doing so,
[1/2] introduces a helper that is used in [2/2] to hopefully get the
same behavior.
I'll set up test environment next week, unless a random act of kindness
al
