On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:44:31AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 10:27:19AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > At best the current code only seems to free the leaf pagetables and
> > the root. If you're unlucky enough to have a large gap (like any
> > QEMU guest with more
here, in
case you guys are interested :)
--
From: Alex Williamson
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 10:27:19 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] intel-iommu: Fix leaks in pagetable freeing
upstream commit: 3269ee0bd6686baf86630300d528500ac5b516d7
At best the current code only seems to free the leaf pagetables and
the root.
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 10:27:19AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> At best the current code only seems to free the leaf pagetables and
> the root. If you're unlucky enough to have a large gap (like any
> QEMU guest with more than 3G of memory), only the first chunk of leaf
> pagetables are freed (
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 09:25:19AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>
> This is a pretty massive memory leak, anyone @Intel care? Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
> On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 10:27 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > At best the current code only seems to free the leaf pagetables and
> > the root. If
This is a pretty massive memory leak, anyone @Intel care? Thanks,
Alex
On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 10:27 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> At best the current code only seems to free the leaf pagetables and
> the root. If you're unlucky enough to have a large gap (like any
> QEMU guest with more than
At best the current code only seems to free the leaf pagetables and
the root. If you're unlucky enough to have a large gap (like any
QEMU guest with more than 3G of memory), only the first chunk of leaf
pagetables are freed (plus the root). This is a massive memory leak.
This patch re-writes the
