Re: [PATCH] KVM: Don't mistreat edge-triggered INIT IPI as INIT de-assert. (LAPIC)

2012-01-24 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 02:02:20PM +0100, j...@alien8.de wrote: > From: Julian Stecklina > > If the guest programs an IPI with level=0 (de-assert) and trig_mode=0 (edge), > it is erroneously treated as INIT de-assert and ignored, but to quote the > spec: "For this delivery mode [INIT de-assert],

[PATCH] KVM: Don't mistreat edge-triggered INIT IPI as INIT de-assert. (LAPIC)

2012-01-16 Thread js
From: Julian Stecklina If the guest programs an IPI with level=0 (de-assert) and trig_mode=0 (edge), it is erroneously treated as INIT de-assert and ignored, but to quote the spec: "For this delivery mode [INIT de-assert], the level flag must be set to 0 and trigger mode flag to 1." Signed-off-b

Re: [PATCH] KVM: Don't mistreat edge-triggered INIT IPI as INIT de-assert. (LAPIC)

2012-01-16 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:46:19PM +0100, Julian Stecklina wrote: > Am Freitag, den 13.01.2012, 08:52 -0200 schrieb Marcelo Tosatti: > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 06:07:51PM +0100, Julian Stecklina wrote: > > > Am Freitag, den 23.12.2011, 08:40 -0200 schrieb Marcelo Tosatti: > > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2

Re: [PATCH] KVM: Don't mistreat edge-triggered INIT IPI as INIT de-assert. (LAPIC)

2012-01-13 Thread Julian Stecklina
Am Freitag, den 13.01.2012, 08:52 -0200 schrieb Marcelo Tosatti: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 06:07:51PM +0100, Julian Stecklina wrote: > > Am Freitag, den 23.12.2011, 08:40 -0200 schrieb Marcelo Tosatti: > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 02:14:27AM +0100, Julian Stecklina wrote: > > > > If the guest prog

Re: [PATCH] KVM: Don't mistreat edge-triggered INIT IPI as INIT de-assert. (LAPIC)

2012-01-13 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 06:07:51PM +0100, Julian Stecklina wrote: > Am Freitag, den 23.12.2011, 08:40 -0200 schrieb Marcelo Tosatti: > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 02:14:27AM +0100, Julian Stecklina wrote: > > > If the guest programs an IPI with level=0 (de-assert) and trig_mode=0 > > > (edge), > > >

Re: [PATCH] KVM: Don't mistreat edge-triggered INIT IPI as INIT de-assert. (LAPIC)

2012-01-12 Thread Julian Stecklina
Am Freitag, den 23.12.2011, 08:40 -0200 schrieb Marcelo Tosatti: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 02:14:27AM +0100, Julian Stecklina wrote: > > If the guest programs an IPI with level=0 (de-assert) and trig_mode=0 > > (edge), > > it is erroneously treated as INIT de-assert and ignored, but to quote the >

Re: [PATCH] KVM: Don't mistreat edge-triggered INIT IPI as INIT de-assert. (LAPIC)

2011-12-23 Thread Julian Stecklina
On Fr, 2011-12-23 at 08:40 -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 02:14:27AM +0100, Julian Stecklina wrote: > > If the guest programs an IPI with level=0 (de-assert) and trig_mode=0 > > (edge), > > it is erroneously treated as INIT de-assert and ignored, but to quote the > > spec:

Re: [PATCH] KVM: Don't mistreat edge-triggered INIT IPI as INIT de-assert. (LAPIC)

2011-12-23 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 02:14:27AM +0100, Julian Stecklina wrote: > If the guest programs an IPI with level=0 (de-assert) and trig_mode=0 (edge), > it is erroneously treated as INIT de-assert and ignored, but to quote the > spec: "For this delivery mode [INIT de-assert], the level flag must be set

[PATCH] KVM: Don't mistreat edge-triggered INIT IPI as INIT de-assert. (LAPIC)

2011-12-18 Thread Julian Stecklina
If the guest programs an IPI with level=0 (de-assert) and trig_mode=0 (edge), it is erroneously treated as INIT de-assert and ignored, but to quote the spec: "For this delivery mode [INIT de-assert], the level flag must be set to 0 and trigger mode flag to 1." Signed-off-by: Julian Stecklina ---