On 07/01/2009 08:16 PM, Martin Bligh wrote:
Is KVM x86_64 only?
It's x86-64, i386, ia64, s390, and powerpc 44x/e500 only.
OK, then it's difficult to see using binaries? Can we not
compile these on the system at use time (see the client/deps
directory for other stuff we do this f
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 10:16 -0700, Martin Bligh wrote:
> LMR: me too, hate putting binaries in source tree, but the alternative
> option is to provide separate *.tar.bz2 for all the binary utils, and
> I don't sure which way is better.
>
> >>>
> >>> Yes, I don't have a clear ide
LMR: me too, hate putting binaries in source tree, but the alternative
option is to provide separate *.tar.bz2 for all the binary utils, and
I don't sure which way is better.
>>>
>>> Yes, I don't have a clear idea as well. It's currently under
>>> discussion...
>>>
>>
>> Is KVM
On 07/01/2009 07:18 PM, Martin Bligh wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 14:43 +0300, Alexey Eremenko wrote:
LMR: me too, hate putting binaries in source tree, but the alternative
option is to provide separate *.tar.bz2 for al
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 14:43 +0300, Alexey Eremenko wrote:
>> LMR: me too, hate putting binaries in source tree, but the alternative
>> option is to provide separate *.tar.bz2 for all the binary utils, and
>> I don't sure which way is