igned-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti
Tested-by: Luiz Capitulino
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index cc2c759..ea40d24 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -2188,6 +2188,8 @@ int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_v
On Thu, 21 May 2015 21:41:23 -0300
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:13:03PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > On 05/18/2015 10:02 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > On 05/18/2015 08:13 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > >> GOn Mon, May 18, 2015 at 07:45:41PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > >>>
table
sched_clock callback. So, let the scheduler know this which
in turn makes NOHZ_FULL work in the guest.
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti
Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino
---
PS: Original author of this patch is Marcelo. I did most of the
testing and backported it to an older real-time kernel tree.
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 11:52:34 +0530
Amit Shah wrote:
> > >Another important detail is that, I *suspect* that a very similar
> > >bug already exists with 32-bit guests even without memory
> > >hotplug: what happens if you assign 6GB to a 32-bit without PAE
> > >support? I think the same problem we'r
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 08:27:00 +0100
Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Luiz Capitulino writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Reproducer:
> >
> > 1. Start QEMU with balloon and memory hotplug support:
> >
> > # qemu [...] -m 1G,slots=2,maxmem=2G -balloon virtio
&g
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 12:09:20 +0800
zhanghailiang wrote:
> On 2015/2/27 3:26, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Reproducer:
> >
> > 1. Start QEMU with balloon and memory hotplug support:
> >
> > # qemu [...] -m 1G,slots=2,maxmem=2G
Hello,
Reproducer:
1. Start QEMU with balloon and memory hotplug support:
# qemu [...] -m 1G,slots=2,maxmem=2G -balloon virtio
2. Check balloon size:
(qemu) info balloon
balloon: actual=1024
(qemu)
3. Hotplug some memory:
(qemu) object_add memory-backend-ram,id=mem1,size=1G
(qemu) device_ad
I got a report of someone trying to run tests with a large amount of
RAM (4GB), which broke the guest as free_memory() function (called
by setup_vm()) will override the PCI hole.
Let's document memory constraints so that people don't do that.
Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino
---
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:43:45 +1030
Rusty Russell wrote:
> Luiz Capitulino writes:
> > On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 09:10:47 +1030
> > Rusty Russell wrote:
> >
> >> Luiz Capitulino writes:
> >> > From: Luiz capitulino
> >> >
> >> > Th
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 20:38:19 -0500
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > What does qemu do with this information?
>
> There are two possible scenarios:
>
> 1. The balloon driver is currently inflating when it gets under
> pressure
>
> QEMU resets "num_pages&qu
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 09:10:47 +1030
Rusty Russell wrote:
> Luiz Capitulino writes:
> > From: Luiz capitulino
> >
> > This commit adds support to a new virtqueue called message virtqueue.
>
> OK, this needs a lot of thought (especially since reworking the virtio
&g
both, which I guess means
automatic balloon is not regressing this
- vm-up did swap a bit, not sure if this is a problem
Now the code, and I think I deserve a coffee after having wrote
all this stuff...
Signed-off-by: Luiz capitulino
---
hw/virtio/virtio-balloon.c | 180 +
From: Luiz capitulino
This is necessary for automatic ballooning. If the guest gets
under pressure while there's an on-going inflation operation,
we want the guest to do the following:
1. Stop on-going inflation
2. Notify the host we're under pressure
3. Wait for host's ack
From: Luiz capitulino
This commit adds support to a new virtqueue called message virtqueue.
The message virtqueue can be used by guests to notify the host about
important memory-related state changes in the guest. Currently, the
only implemented notification is the "guest is under pressure
Pekka Enberg
Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen
Cc: Dave Chinner
Cc: John Stultz
Cc: Andrew Morton
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Signed-off-by: Luiz capitulino
---
include/linux/vmpressure.h | 5 +
mm/vmpressure.c
From: Luiz capitulino
1. Allow drivers to register private data
2. Allow drivers to pass css=NULL
3. Pass level to the callback
Signed-off-by: Luiz capitulino
---
include/linux/vmpressure.h | 3 ++-
mm/vmpressure.c| 13 +
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions
, it's added here for the convenience of someone who wants to try
automatic ballooning. Patch 2/4 is a hack to make in-kernel vmpressure work
for something not related to cgroups, I'll improve it in later versions.
Glauber Costa (1):
vmpressure: in-kernel notifications
Luiz cap
According to the virtio spec, the device configuration field
that should be updated after an inflation or deflation
operation is the 'actual' field, not the 'num_pages' one.
Commit 855e0c5288177bcb193f6f6316952d2490478e1c swapped them
in update_balloon_size(). Fix it.
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 00:52:31 -0500
Rob Landley wrote:
> I intermittently get this from current kernels running under currentish
> qemu-git. Look familiar to anybody?
Which kernel do you run in the host? Is the guest doing anything
special?
>
> reboot: machine restart
> general protection fau
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 21:18:37 -0400
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> The balloon_page_dequeue() function can return NULL. If it does for
> the first page being freed, then leak_balloon() will create a
> scatter list with len=0. Which in turn seems to generate an invalid
> virtio request.
>
On Thu, 6 Jun 2013 11:13:58 -0300
Rafael Aquini wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 09:18:37PM -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > The balloon_page_dequeue() function can return NULL. If it does for
> > the first page being freed, then leak_balloon() will create a
> > scatter l
such an invalid virtio request will cause errors in QEMU and
fill_balloon() also performs the same check implemented by this commit.
Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino
Acked-by: Rafael Aquini
---
o v2
- Improve changelog
drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 18:24:49 -0300
Rafael Aquini wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 05:10:31PM -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > The balloon_page_dequeue() function can return NULL. If it does for
> > the first page being freed, then leak_balloon() will create a
> > scatter l
The balloon_page_dequeue() function can return NULL. If it does for
the first page being freed, then leak_balloon() will create a
scatter list with len=0. Which in turn seems to generate an invalid
virtio request.
Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino
---
PS: I didn't get this in practice. I fou
1. s/These are devices are/These devices are
2. s/Thefirst/The first
3. s/, Guest should/. Guest should
Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino
---
virtio-spec.lyx | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virtio-spec.lyx b/virtio-spec.lyx
index 6e188d0..7e4ce71 100644
On Fri, 31 May 2013 16:52:18 +0800
Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> Luiz Capitulino reported that guest refused to boot and qemu
> complained with:
> kvm_set_phys_mem: error unregistering overlapping slot: Invalid argument
>
> It is caused by commit 235e8982ad that did double free for t
On Thu, 16 May 2013 16:56:34 -0400
Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 05/09/2013 10:53 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This series is a respin of automatic ballooning support I started
> > working on last year. Patch 2/2 contains all relevant technical
> > det
On Mon, 13 May 2013 22:02:50 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 02:25:11PM -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 May 2013 11:34:41 -0300
> > Rafael Aquini wrote:
> >
> > > You're right, and the host's member
On Mon, 13 May 2013 11:34:41 -0300
Rafael Aquini wrote:
> You're right, and the host's member is used to communicate the configured size
> to guest's balloon device, however, by not changing it when the shrinker
> causes
> the balloon to deflate will make the balloon thread to be woken up again
On Sun, 12 May 2013 21:49:34 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 12:36:09PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On 05/12/2013 10:30 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:53:49AM -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >
On Fri, 10 May 2013 09:20:46 -0400
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Thu, 9 May 2013 18:15:19 -0300
> Rafael Aquini wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:53:49AM -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > > Automatic ballooning consists of dynamically adjusting the guest's
>
On Thu, 9 May 2013 18:15:19 -0300
Rafael Aquini wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:53:49AM -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > Automatic ballooning consists of dynamically adjusting the guest's
> > balloon according to memory pressure in the host and in the guest.
> >
On Thu, 9 May 2013 18:03:09 -0300
Rafael Aquini wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:53:48AM -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > This commit moves the balloon_lock mutex out of the fill_balloon()
> > and leak_balloon() functions to their callers.
> >
> > The reason for t
semantics.
Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino
---
drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
index bd3ae32..9d5fe2b 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
+++ b
4
3649 1079847 1616367
4543 953289 1635379
5642 913237 1514000
Auto-ballooning enabled:
RUN TIME(s) SWAP IN SWAP OUT
1629 901 12537
2624 981 18506
3626 573 9085
4631 2250 42534
5627 1610 20808
Signed-of
rue
5. Balloon the guest memory down, say from 1G to 256MB
6. Generate some pressure in the guest, say a kernel build with -j16
Any feedback is appreciated!
Luiz Capitulino (2):
virtio_balloon: move balloon_lock mutex to callers
virtio_balloon: auto-ballooning support
drivers/virtio/v
this to be dynamically enabled by mngt
Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino
---
o You can find my test script here:
http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/qmp-unstable.git/blob/refs/heads/balloon/auto-ballooning/memcg/rfc:/scripts/autob-test
o You can find the guest driver counterpart code at:
http://re
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:03:21 +0200
Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:06:41AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On 04/23/2013 08:45 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> > > we can change "drive_mirror" to use a new command to see if there
> > > are the new features.
> >
> > drive-mirror ch
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:06:41 -0600
Eric Blake wrote:
> > we can change "drive_mirror" to use a new command to see if there
> > are the new features.
>
> drive-mirror changed in 1.4 to add optional buf-size parameter; right
> now, libvirt is forced to limit itself to 1.3 interface (no buf-siz
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:18:54 +0800
Wen Congyang wrote:
> We can know the guest is panicked when the guest runs on xen.
> But we do not have such feature on kvm.
What's the status of this series?
It got lost in my queue and I ended up not reviewing it, but it seems
to be stuck.
>
> Another pur
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:59:00 +0200
Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Juan Quintela writes:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > This are this week minutes:
> >
> > - URI parsing library for glusterfs: libxml2 vs. in-tree "fork" of the
> > same code. (Paolo)
> > * code hasn't changed in 2 years, it is really stable
> >
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:48:26 +0200
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 24/09/2012 13:28, Juan Quintela ha scritto:
> > Hi
> >
> > Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>
> URI parsing library for glusterfs: libxml2 vs. in-tree "fork" of the
> same code.
Case we're going to have
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 07:57:53 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini writes:
>
> > Il 24/09/2012 13:28, Juan Quintela ha scritto:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
> >
> > URI parsing library for glusterfs: libxml2 vs. in-tree "fork" of the
the GenericError
> class. So let's also handle this exception class.
>
> CC: Luiz Capitulino
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
> ---
> client/virt/kvm_monitor.py | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/client/virt/kvm_monito
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:02:11 -0300
Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
> When using QMP monitor as the sole monitor on KVM autotest
> (something that we sadly did not exercise on our test farms),
> starting qemu with -S and then issuing 'cont' will cause
> errors, since the error treatment with QMP m
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:40:45 +0100
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 09:35:04AM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:55:37 +0800
> > Wen Congyang wrote:
> >
> > > >> +static void panicked_perform
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:55:37 +0800
Wen Congyang wrote:
> >> +static void panicked_perform_action(void)
> >> +{
> >> +switch(panicked_action) {
> >> +case PANICKED_REPORT:
> >> +panicked_mon_event("report");
> >> +break;
> >> +
> >> +case PANICKED_PAUSE:
> >> +p
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 12:56:41 +0800
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 05/25/2012 08:53 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 May 2012 13:01:37 +0100
> > Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >
> >> I agree it would be nice to drop entirely but I don't feel happy doing
>
On Mon, 21 May 2012 14:50:51 +0800
Wen Congyang wrote:
> When the guest is panicked, it will write 0x1 to the port 0x505. So if
> qemu reads 0x1 from this port, we can do the folloing three things
> according to the parameter -onpanic:
> 1. emit QEVENT_GUEST_PANICKED only
> 2. emit QEVENT_GUEST_P
On Mon, 21 May 2012 14:49:32 +0800
Wen Congyang wrote:
> The guest should run after reseting it, but it does not
> run if its old state is RUN_STATE_INTERNAL_ERROR or RUN_STATE_PAUSED.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang
> ---
> vl.c |1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
On Mon, 28 May 2012 12:17:04 +0100
Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> What we need to decide is whether it's okay to drop QEMU "VLANs"
> completely and change dump command-line syntax?
I'd vote for dropping it.
> I think vlan-hub doesn't hurt anyone because the code has been isolated
> and we keep backwa
On Fri, 25 May 2012 15:47:28 +0200
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 25/05/2012 15:43, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
> >> Yeah, VDE probably includes something like an hub. But then we could
> >> drop even "-net socket", "-net udp", "-net dump", and on
On Fri, 25 May 2012 15:37:15 +0200
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 25/05/2012 15:30, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
> > On Fri, 25 May 2012 15:19:28 +0200
> > Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
> >> Il 25/05/2012 15:18, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
> >>>>>
>
On Fri, 25 May 2012 15:19:28 +0200
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 25/05/2012 15:18, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
> >> >
> >> > Still not sure what you mean...
> > I meant it's a similar case. kqemu was a special case and maintenance
> > burden.
> > W
On Fri, 25 May 2012 15:14:39 +0200
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 25/05/2012 15:07, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
> > On Fri, 25 May 2012 14:59:25 +0200
> > Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
> >> Il 25/05/2012 14:53, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
> >>>>> I agr
On Fri, 25 May 2012 14:59:25 +0200
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 25/05/2012 14:53, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
> >> > I agree it would be nice to drop entirely but I don't feel happy doing
> >> > that to users who might have QEMU buried in scripts somewhere. One
>
On Fri, 25 May 2012 13:01:37 +0100
Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> I agree it would be nice to drop entirely but I don't feel happy doing
> that to users who might have QEMU buried in scripts somewhere. One
> day they upgrade packages and suddenly their stuff doesn't work
> anymore.
This is very simil
On Fri, 25 May 2012 08:47:18 +0800
Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Luiz Capitulino
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 May 2012 01:59:06 +0800
> > zwu.ker...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> From: Zhi Yong Wu
> >>
> >> The patchset impl
On Fri, 25 May 2012 01:59:06 +0800
zwu.ker...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Zhi Yong Wu
>
> The patchset implements network hub stead of vlan. The main work was done by
> stefan, and i rebased it to latest QEMU upstream, did some testings and am
> responsible for pushing it to QEMU upstream.
Hones
On Tue, 08 May 2012 07:14:11 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 05/07/2012 06:47 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>
> I've got a conflict at 9am as it turns out so I won't be able to attend.
Does this mean the call is can
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:48:43 +0200
Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/21/2012 03:40 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > On 2012-03-21 13:38, GaoYi wrote:
> > > Hi Jan,
> > >
> > > Since the newest Intel-VT supports the guest OS under the real mode,
> > > which was already supported in AMD-V, can the VMX in th
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:05:58 +0800
Wen Congyang wrote:
> When the host knows the guest is paniced, it will set
> exit_reason to KVM_EXIT_GUEST_PANIC. So if qemu receive
> this exit_reason, we can send a event to tell management
> application that the guest is paniced.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Cong
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:02:05 +0100
Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 24 October 2011 12:35, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 10/24/2011 01:04 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
> >
> > - What's left to merge for 1.0.
>
> Things on my list, FWIW:
>
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 11:35:20 +0800
Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>
>
> Adds new QERR_UNSUPPORTED, converts "nmi" to "inject-nmi" and
> make it supports qmp.
Lai, unfortunately this series still have some issues (like changing
the HMP command name). I think V7 was the best submission so far, so
I decide
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:30:25 +0800
Huang Ying wrote:
> On 04/28/2011 10:04 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 08:00:19AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> On 04/27/2011 06:06 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 04:17:35PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> O
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:54:34 +0800
Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On 04/26/2011 09:29 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > On 04/26/2011 08:26 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >> On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:23:54 +0800
> >> Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> >>
> >>>
>
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:23:54 +0800
Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>
> Hi, Anthony Liguori
>
> Any suggestion?
>
> Although all command line interfaces will be converted to to use QMP
> interfaces in 0.16,
> I hope inject-nmi come into QAPI earlier, 0.15.
I don't know what Anthony thinks about adding n
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:53:56 +0800
Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On 04/04/2011 09:09 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > On 04/04/2011 07:19 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> [Note cc: Anthony]
> >>
> >> "Daniel P. Berrange" writes:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 05:46:28PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 21:31:18 +0300
Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 04/11/2011 08:15 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Markus Armbruster
> >> wrote:
> >> > Avi Kivity writes:
> >> >
> >> >> On 04/08/2011 12:41 AM,
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 22:04:52 +0200
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-04-11 21:15, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:00:32 -0600
> > Alex Williamson wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 15:35 -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 08 Apr
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:00:32 -0600
Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 15:35 -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 19:50:57 -0500
> > Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> > > On 04/08/2011 06:25 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > &
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 19:50:57 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 04/08/2011 06:25 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Summary:
> >
> > - PXE boot in qemu.git (HEAD f124a41) is quite slow, more than 5 minutes.
> > Got
> > the pr
On Sat, 9 Apr 2011 13:34:43 +0300
Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Luiz Capitulino
> wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Summary:
> >
> > - PXE boot in qemu.git (HEAD f124a41) is quite slow, more than 5 minutes.
> > Got
> > the
Hi there,
Summary:
- PXE boot in qemu.git (HEAD f124a41) is quite slow, more than 5 minutes. Got
the problem with e1000, virtio and rtl8139. However, pcnet *works* (it's
as fast as qemu-kvm.git)
- PXE boot in qemu-kvm.git (HEAD df85c051) is fast, less than a minute. Tried
with e1000,
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 20:17:47 +0200
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-04-06 20:08, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 13:03:37 -0500
> > Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> >> On 04/06/2011 12:47 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 0
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 13:03:37 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 04/06/2011 12:47 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 08:05:48 -0500
> > Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> >> On 04/04/2011 07:54 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>> On 04/
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 08:05:48 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 04/04/2011 07:54 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 04/04/2011 01:59 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >> Interesting that with HMP you need to specify a single CPU index, but
> >> with QMP it is injecting to all CPUs at once. Is there any co
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 08:09:29 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 04/04/2011 07:19 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > [Note cc: Anthony]
> >
> > "Daniel P. Berrange" writes:
> >
> >> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 05:46:28PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> >>> From: Lai Jiangshan
> >>> Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 1
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:19:58 +0200
Markus Armbruster wrote:
> [Note cc: Anthony]
>
> "Daniel P. Berrange" writes:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 05:46:28PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> >> From: Lai Jiangshan
> >> Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 17:05:15 +0800
> >> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] qemu,qmp: add inj
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:58:35 +0100
Juan Quintela wrote:
>
> Please, send in any agenda items you are interested in covening.
>
> - Merge patches speed. I just "feel", that patches are not being
> handled fast enough, so ... I looked how much patches have been
> integrated since Mars 1st:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:25:38 -0600
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/27/2011 02:20 AM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > Make we can inject NMI via qemu-monitor-protocol.
> > We use "inject-nmi" for the qmp command name, the meaning is clearer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan
> > ---
> > diff --git a/h
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 09:37:57 +0800
Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Hi, Luiz Capitulino
>
> Any problem?
Sorry for the delay. Looks good in general to me know, there's only one
small problem and it's the error message:
(qemu) nmi 100
Parameter 'cpu-index' expects a
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:13:04 -0600
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 02/21/2011 11:12 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> > please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
> >
>
> - 0.14.0 release is out, thanks to everyone that participated! Let's
> discuss what worked well, what could
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:46:32 +0800
Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On 02/01/2011 09:29 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:20:27 +0800
> > Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> >
> >> "cpu-index" which uses hyphen is better name.
> >>
> >>
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:20:27 +0800
Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> "cpu-index" which uses hyphen is better name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan
It looks ok from a quick pass, but I can't apply it on current master, what
commit HEAD did you?
Btw, please, do include the patch 0/0 with a general descr
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 10:53:21 -0200
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:39:22 -0600
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
> > On 01/31/2011 12:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > > On 2011-01-31 11:02, Juan Quintela wrote:
> > >
> > >> Please send in a
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:39:22 -0600
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/31/2011 12:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > On 2011-01-31 11:02, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >
> >> Please send in any agenda items you are interested incovering.
> >>
> >>
> > o KVM upstream merge: status, plans, coordination
>
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 16:06:20 +0100
Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 28.01.2011, at 21:10, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
> >
> > GSoC 2011 has been announced[1]. As we were pretty successful last year,
> > I think we should participate again.
Hi there,
GSoC 2011 has been announced[1]. As we were pretty successful last year,
I think we should participate again. I've already created a wiki page:
http://wiki.qemu.org/Google_Summer_of_Code_2011
We should now populate it with projects and people willing to be mentors
should say so (or ju
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:57:27 -0200
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:06:34 -0600
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
> > On 01/24/2011 07:25 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
> > > Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
> > >
> >
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:06:34 -0600
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/24/2011 07:25 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
> > Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
> >
>
> - coroutines for the block layer
> - glib everywhere
- Let's start planning our next release in advance, here's
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:28:14 +0800
Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Make we can inject NMI via qemu-monitor-protocol.
> We use "inject-nmi" for the qmp command name, the meaning is clearer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan
> ---
> diff --git a/hmp-commands.hx b/hmp-commands.hx
> index a49fcd4..4db413d 1
Sorry for the long delay on this one, in general looks good, I have just
a few small comments.
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:27:51 +0800
Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> When the argument "cpu-index" is not given,
> then "nmi" command will inject NMI on all CPUs.
Please, state that we're changing the human mon
t; error the test with a more descriptive message
>
> Also, clarify the exception thrown when the monitor is not responsive
> after the test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qingtang Zhou
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
Makes sense:
Acked-by: Luiz Capitulino
> ---
> c
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 08:47:46 -0200
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 09:20:26AM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:36:08 +0800
> > Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> >
> > > +SQMP
> > > +inject_nmi
> > > +--
&g
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:00:34 +0100
Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Lai Jiangshan writes:
>
> > "cpu-index" is better name.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan
> > ---
> > diff --git a/hmp-commands.hx b/hmp-commands.hx
> > index 4befbe2..8de7aa3 100644
> > --- a/hmp-commands.hx
> > +++ b/hmp-comma
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 14:09:05 +0800
Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On 12/17/2010 11:25 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 12/17/2010 01:22 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I think Avi's suggest is better, and I will use
> >> > "inject-nm
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:20:15 +0800
Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On 12/16/2010 09:17 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:11:50 +0200
> > Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>
> >> Why have an argument at all? Always nmi to all cpus.
> >
>
> I
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:11:50 +0200
Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 12/16/2010 03:09 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:50:08 +0200
> > Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> > > On 12/16/2010 01:47 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > > > >
> > >
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:50:08 +0200
Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 12/16/2010 01:47 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > >
> > > This has the feature of injecting the nmi in just some cpus, although I'm
> > > not sure this is going to be desired/useful.
> >
> > Use case for NMI-ing a subset of the CPUs?
> >
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
