Re: Fix lapic time counter read for periodic mode

2012-11-12 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
hat the proposed patch in my first mail is incomplete, as the mod_64 does not work correctly for negative values. A fixed version is below. regards Christian Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c index 43e9fad..ec7242c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/la

Fix lapic time counter read for periodic mode

2012-11-11 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
use the negative difference unmodified. regards Christian Fix lapic time counter read for periodic mode. Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c index 43e9fad..eff902d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c

Re: [PATCH 3/3] kvm-s390: streamline memslot handling - rebased

2009-06-15 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
iscussions we might try to catch up on irc to save this thread a few cycles :-) -- Grüsse / regards, Christian Ehrhardt IBM Linux Technology Center, Open Virtualization -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH 3/3] kvm-s390: streamline memslot handling - rebased

2009-06-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Avi Kivity wrote: Christian Ehrhardt wrote: Really need that smp_mb__after_clear_bit ? AFAIK test_and_clear_bit implies a barrier? Well I agree that practically test_and_clear_bit has a barrier on s390, but as far as I read Documentation/atomic_ops.txt at line 339-360 I think the

Re: [PATCH 3/3] kvm-s390: streamline memslot handling - rebased

2009-06-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Marcelo Tosatti wrote: On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 04:26:11PM +0200, ehrha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: From: Christian Ehrhardt [...] @@ -706,13 +713,19 @@ int kvm_arch_set_memory_region(struct kv /* request update of sie control block for all available vcpus */ for (i = 0

Re: [PATCH 4/4] kvm-s390: streamline memslot handling - v6

2009-06-02 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Marcelo Tosatti wrote: On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 11:22:58AM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: ehrha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: From: Christian Ehrhardt *updates in v6* - ensure the wait_on_bit waiter is notified - move the reset of requests to kvm_vcpu_release to drop them early *updates in

Re: [PATCH 1/3] kvm-s390: infrastructure to kick vcpus out of guest state

2009-05-28 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Avi Kivity wrote: Christian Ehrhardt wrote: So you _need_ a mechanism to kick all vcpus out of guest mode? I have a mechanism to kick a vcpu, and I use it. Due to the fact that smp_call_* don't work as kick for us the kick is an arch specific function. I hop ethat clarified this

Re: [PATCH 1/3] kvm-s390: infrastructure to kick vcpus out of guest state

2009-05-28 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Marcelo Tosatti wrote: On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:02:59AM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: Marcelo Tosatti wrote: On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 01:40:49PM +0200, ehrha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: From: Christian Ehrhardt To ensure vcpu's come out of guest context in ce

Re: [PATCH 3/3] kvm-s390: streamline memslot handling

2009-05-26 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
tee) and I try to come up with something in the next few days - either a updated patch series or additional discussion input :-). -- Grüsse / regards, Christian Ehrhardt IBM Linux Technology Center, Open Virtualization -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm"

Re: [PATCH 1/3] kvm-s390: infrastructure to kick vcpus out of guest state

2009-05-26 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Marcelo Tosatti wrote: On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 01:40:49PM +0200, ehrha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: From: Christian Ehrhardt To ensure vcpu's come out of guest context in certain cases this patch adds a s390 specific way to kick them out of guest context. Currently it kicks them o

Re: [PATCH 3/3] kvm-s390: streamline memslot handling

2009-05-25 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Christian Ehrhardt wrote: Avi Kivity wrote: ehrha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: From: Christian Ehrhardt [...] -/* update sie control blocks, and unlock all vcpus */ +/* request update of sie control block for all available vcpus */ for (i = 0; i < KVM_MAX_VCPUS;

Re: [PATCH 3/3] kvm-s390: streamline memslot handling

2009-05-25 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Avi Kivity wrote: ehrha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: From: Christian Ehrhardt This patch relocates the variables kvm-s390 uses to track guest mem addr/size. As discussed dropping the variables at struct kvm_arch level allows to use the common vcpu->request based mechanism to reload gu

Re: [PATCH 1/6] kvm-s390: Fix memory slot versus run

2009-05-20 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Avi Kivity wrote: Christian Ehrhardt wrote: The bad thing on vcpu->request in that case is that I don't want the async behaviour of vcpu->requests in that case, I want the memory slot updated in all vcpu's when the ioctl is returning. You mean, the hardware can access the vc

Re: [PATCH 1/6] kvm-s390: Fix memory slot versus run

2009-05-12 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Avi Kivity wrote: Christian Ehrhardt wrote: Avi Kivity wrote: Christian Ehrhardt wrote: The bad thing on vcpu->request in that case is that I don't want the async behaviour of vcpu->requests in that case, I want the memory slot updated in all vcpu's when the ioctl is retur

Re: [PATCH 1/6] kvm-s390: Fix memory slot versus run

2009-05-12 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Avi Kivity wrote: Christian Ehrhardt wrote: The bad thing on vcpu->request in that case is that I don't want the async behaviour of vcpu->requests in that case, I want the memory slot updated in all vcpu's when the ioctl is returning. You mean, the hardware can access

Re: [PATCH 1/6] kvm-s390: Fix memory slot versus run

2009-05-11 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Avi Kivity wrote: Christian Ehrhardt wrote: I thought about implementing it with slots_lock, vcpu->request, etc but it really looks like overkill for s390. We could make (some of) it common code, so it won't look so bad. There's value in having all kvm ports do things similar

Re: [PATCH 1/6] kvm-s390: Fix memory slot versus run

2009-05-11 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Avi Kivity wrote: Christian Ehrhardt wrote: On x86, we use slots_lock to protect memory slots. When we change the global memory configuration, we set a bit in vcpu->requests, and send an IPI to all cpus that are currently in guest mode for our guest. This forces the cpu back to host m

Re: [PATCH 1/6] kvm-s390: Fix memory slot versus run

2009-05-11 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
anged the code using mutex_trylock and in case I can't get the lock I explicitly let the vcpu exit from guest. -- Grüsse / regards, Christian Ehrhardt IBM Linux Technology Center, Open Virtualization -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm&quo

Re: [PATCH 4/6] kvm-s390: Unlink vcpu on destroy

2009-05-11 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
t;kvm->arch.sca->cpu[vcpu->vcpu_id].sda = 0; free_page((unsigned long)(vcpu->arch.sie_block)); If this is accessed by hardware on a different cpu, don't you need a memory barrier here? Right, will be in v2 -- Grüsse / regards, Christian Ehrhardt IBM Linux Technol

Re: [PATCH] qemu: fix configuring kvm probe when using --kerneldir

2009-01-11 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Andre Przywara wrote: ehrha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: From: Christian Ehrhardt There is already a variable kvm_cflags which gets the path of the kernel includes when using --kerneldir. But eventually with newer kernels we all will need arch/$arch/include too (my case was a incldue of asm

Re: [PATCH] qemu: report issues causing the kvm probe to fail v3

2009-01-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Anthony Liguori wrote: ehrha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: From: Christian Ehrhardt The patch applies to upstream qemu as well as kvm-userspace, but since it is the qemu configure script I think it should go to upstream qemu (Anthony) first and with the next merge to kvm-userspace. On the

Re: [PATCH] kvm: work around inability of older kvm modules to destroy memory regions

2008-12-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Avi Kivity wrote: Christian Ehrhardt wrote: Hi, this patch breaks all non x86 architectures as libkvm/libkvm-x86.c has the only implementation of the alias functionality. Until now only qemu-kvm-x86 has called that functions, but since this patch the generic qemu-kvm.c calls them which leads

Re: [PATCH] [PATCH] qemu: report issues causing the kvm probe to fail

2008-12-15 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Avi Kivity wrote: Christian Ehrhardt wrote: I ran into the issue of a failign KVM Probe of the qemu configure script three times this week always needing "set -x", inserting an exit, masking the cleanup trap and compiling the c file by hand until I knew what the reason is. I think

[PATCH] [PATCH] qemu: report issues causing the kvm probe to fail v2

2008-12-15 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
# HG changeset patch # User Christian Ehrhardt # Date 1229347014 -3600 # Node ID c754b8806d756a19c57fc3b3e317bbe3c147d5ec # Parent f7dc67cd9b74c5d7ad322686e58325f879d93468 [PATCH] qemu: report issues causing the kvm probe to fail v2 From: Christian Ehrhardt *update to v2* It now reports all

[PATCH] [PATCH] kvm-userspace: ppc: fix compatfd build decision v2

2008-12-15 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
# HG changeset patch # User Christian Ehrhardt # Date 1229345133 -3600 # Node ID b48b9d560f80037ab4e12eae128022622c7ccb34 # Parent 4b0ad05490115e4c6f31d2419c0e5b628040f90b [PATCH] kvm-userspace: ppc: fix compatfd build decision v2 From: Christian Ehrhardt qemu-kvm.c uses qemu_eventfd

Re: [PATCH 1 of 6] [PATCH] kvm-userspace: ppc: fix compatfd build decision

2008-12-15 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
compatfd.c takes care if CONFIG_signalfd/CONFIG_eventfd are set. Therefore we can savely remove the makefile guard completely and just always build compatfd.c. This updated patch works for x86&powerpc with/without --disable-aio in my tests. It should appear on the list shortly. -- Grüsse / rega

[PATCH] [PATCH] kvm-userspace: gdb: fix new gdb function types

2008-12-12 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
# HG changeset patch # User Christian Ehrhardt # Date 1229085659 -3600 # Node ID 37967a80a2757505488685aac135681945e6da91 # Parent f0ed33f14658fe91a14ec02501cb42d26e32f01f [PATCH] kvm-userspace: gdb: fix new gdb function types From: Christian Ehrhardt The types changed in the header but not

Re: [PATCH] [PATCH] qemu: ppc: kvm-userspace: KVM PowerPC support for qemu gdbstub

2008-12-12 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Hollis Blanchard wrote: On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 17:05 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: Hollis Blanchard wrote: On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 13:53 +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: This is v2 as version one had a type in it occured when splitting patches. Mercurial somehow lost my changes to the

[PATCH] [PATCH] qemu: report issues causing the kvm probe to fail

2008-12-11 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
# HG changeset patch # User Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # Date 1229005383 -3600 # Node ID d788f32f8f60f3a0d86ab218459089e5186632ca # Parent f7dc67cd9b74c5d7ad322686e58325f879d93468 [PATCH] qemu: report issues causing the kvm probe to fail From: Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL

[PATCH] [PATCH] qemu: ppc: kvm-userspace: KVM PowerPC support for qemu gdbstub

2008-12-11 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
# HG changeset patch # User Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # Date 1228999833 -3600 # Node ID dc1466c9077ab162f4637fffee1869f26be02299 # Parent 4c07fe2a56c7653a9113e05bb08c2de9aec210ce [PATCH] qemu: ppc: kvm-userspace: KVM PowerPC support for qemu gdbstub From: Hollis Blanchard &

Re: [PATCH] [PATCH] qemu: ppc: kvm-userspace: KVM PowerPC support for qemu gdbstub

2008-12-11 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
This is v2 as version one had a type in it occured when splitting patches. Mercurial somehow lost my changes to the patch description explaining that, but the patch is right this way. Christian Ehrhardt wrote: # HG changeset patch # User Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[PATCH 3 of 3] [PATCH] kvm-userspace: fix gdbstub kvm integration

2008-12-11 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
# HG changeset patch # User Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # Date 1228989958 -3600 # Node ID f80fb35de91fe69dae889c70948c9a53212ee444 # Parent 6f228c807ad0b239b7342d2974debfc66418d784 [PATCH] kvm-userspace: fix gdbstub kvm integration From: Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTE

[PATCH 1 of 3] [PATCH] kvm-userspace: ppc: Add kvm_translate wrapper

2008-12-11 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
# HG changeset patch # User Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # Date 1228924564 -3600 # Node ID 38846cef16e56c681da1ddc179e248972c8b2ff9 # Parent 705d874ff7a24484eaa15ed75a748c4e1a70c2ef [PATCH] kvm-userspace: ppc: Add kvm_translate wrapper From: Hollis Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECT

[PATCH 2 of 3] [PATCH] qemu: ppc: kvm-userspace: KVM PowerPC support for qemu gdbstub

2008-12-11 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
# HG changeset patch # User Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # Date 1228989956 -3600 # Node ID 6f228c807ad0b239b7342d2974debfc66418d784 # Parent 38846cef16e56c681da1ddc179e248972c8b2ff9 [PATCH] qemu: ppc: kvm-userspace: KVM PowerPC support for qemu gdbstub From: Hollis Blanchard &

[PATCH 0 of 3] update gdbstub support

2008-12-11 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
This patch series updates the gdbstub support for kvm. Patch 1&2 introduce basic powerpc support while patch 3 fixes gdbstub generic code that was broken in a qemu merge. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo i

[PATCH 6 of 6] [PATCH] kvm-userspace: ppc: align with upstream qemu - pcibus

2008-12-10 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
# HG changeset patch # User Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # Date 1228922789 -3600 # Node ID 9a7208ca1afab83913ee14c629bf27632ee6326b # Parent 5adc6fbbd4a3b82e1bc8acbcb233c60e89715b61 [PATCH] kvm-userspace: ppc: align with upstream qemu - pcibus From: Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL

[PATCH 2 of 6] [PATCH] kvm-userspace: ppc: fix configure enabling kvm for ppc

2008-12-10 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
# HG changeset patch # User Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # Date 1228922788 -3600 # Node ID f100b1bfa5f3d084d68bd2c66244271db1f5d084 # Parent b41f0d6129f51fb86bf799a5fe7b14a9270eeca4 [PATCH] kvm-userspace: ppc: fix configure enabling kvm for ppc From: Christian Ehrhardt &

[PATCH 3 of 6] [PATCH] kvm-userspace: ppc: align with upstream qemu - breakpoint reset

2008-12-10 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
# HG changeset patch # User Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # Date 1228922788 -3600 # Node ID c032d8555c9494f9812e4d4e0b5b511ae597 # Parent f100b1bfa5f3d084d68bd2c66244271db1f5d084 [PATCH] kvm-userspace: ppc: align with upstream qemu - breakpoint reset From: Christian Ehrhardt &

[PATCH 4 of 6] [PATCH] kvm-userpace: ppc: align with upstream qemu - 4xxdevs

2008-12-10 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
# HG changeset patch # User Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # Date 1228922788 -3600 # Node ID 214485869c303ab81c9da30b6784d641f58585f4 # Parent c032d8555c9494f9812e4d4e0b5b511ae597 [PATCH] kvm-userpace: ppc: align with upstream qemu - 4xxdevs From: Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL

[PATCH 5 of 6] [PATCH] kvm-userspace: ppc: use virtio-blk header

2008-12-10 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
# HG changeset patch # User Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # Date 1228922789 -3600 # Node ID 5adc6fbbd4a3b82e1bc8acbcb233c60e89715b61 # Parent 214485869c303ab81c9da30b6784d641f58585f4 [PATCH] kvm-userspace: ppc: use virtio-blk header From: Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL

[PATCH 1 of 6] [PATCH] kvm-userspace: ppc: fix compatfd build decision

2008-12-10 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
# HG changeset patch # User Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # Date 1228922788 -3600 # Node ID b41f0d6129f51fb86bf799a5fe7b14a9270eeca4 # Parent 3af3fa5e009e143e1167979e55d547c453661059 [PATCH] kvm-userspace: ppc: fix compatfd build decision From: Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL

Re: [PATCH] kvm: work around inability of older kvm modules to destroy memory regions

2008-12-10 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
en, 0); #endif return 0; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-commits" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Grüsse / regards, Christian Ehrhardt IBM Linux Technology Center,

kvm-userspace requires kvm capable kernel headers in default search path of the compiler

2008-12-10 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
overlooked something and there is an even better or trivial approach :-) Since this could be solved several very different ways I think its worth a discussion. As I prefer b) I attached a simple patch example how this could look like :-). -- Grüsse / regards, Christian Ehrhardt IBM

Re: [PATCH] [mq]: fix-kvm-init.diff

2008-11-10 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
59,10 +2959,8 @@ env->cpu_model_str = cpu_model; cpu_ppc_register_internal(env, def); cpu_ppc_reset(env); -#ifdef USE_KVM if (kvm_enabled()) - kvm_init_new_ap(env->cpu_index, env); -#endif + kvm_init_vcpu(env); return env; } -- Grüsse / regards, Christi

Re: [PATCH 0 of 7] kvm-userspace: support multiple processors in the same architecture

2008-10-30 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
c :-) I know you started with the arch-platform-os-compiler after our discussion, but I like the $PROCESSOR solution for our *powerpc* Makefiles too. And a good catch with that AR usage in patch 7. (full series) Acked-by: Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Grüsse / regards, Chri

Re: [PATCH 03 of 10] [PATCH] user: ppc: better error reporting in load_file

2008-10-29 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
nchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This patch adds a better error reporting for powerpc testcases. It prints the bytes read in load_file so far until an error occured. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- [dif

Re: [PATCH 0/3] kvm-userspace: ppc: userspace fixes for powerpc

2008-10-28 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
single patch I just submitted while cleaning our userspace repo to get the missing things upstream. Avi, let me know if I confused you and I'll send them once again with some time in between to order them easier. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] kvm-userspace: kvmppc: fix hostlonbits detection when cross compiling v2

2008-10-01 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
malc wrote: On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *update* further debugging according to some requests revealed that ARCH_CFLAGS does not contain all CFLAGS that might be needed, especially those supplied via extra-cflags. The

Re: [PATCH 0 of 5] PowerPC patches for 2.6.27

2008-07-29 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
gt; > > By the way, I will be on vacation for a few weeks starting Monday, but > > Christian Ehrhardt should be able to take care of any technical issues. > > Applied all; thanks. I prefer to only merge bug fixes at this time for > 2.6.27. As far as I can tell, patch 2 is independ

Re: [PATCH 5 of 5] kvm: powerpc: Map guest userspace with TID=0 mappings

2008-07-29 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
be working fine. > > > > The net is that we don't need to flush the TLB on privilege > > switches, but we do on guest context switches (which are far > > more infrequent). Guest boot time performance improvement: about 30%. > > -- Grüsse / regards, Christi

Re: [PATCH v2/RFC] libkvm-s390

2008-07-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
could do things like - initialize i with 0 and let the whole block until the for loop run in "if !defined(__s390__)" That way you would additionally stop modifying the tss_ext variable which is not used in the s390 case anyway. [...] -- Grüsse / regards, Christian Ehrha

Re: kvmtrace?

2008-07-10 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
On Monday 07 July 2008 17:34:13 Jun Koi wrote: > On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Christian Ehrhardt > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jun Koi wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Could anybody explain a bit about kvmtrace? I cannot find any doc on > &

Re: [PATCH 2/5] kvmtrace: make cycle calculation architecture aware

2008-07-09 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Hollis Blanchard wrote: On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 15:56 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The current implementation of kvmtrace uses always a 64 bit cycle variable, but get_cycles() which is used to fill it is "unsigned long" which

Re: [PATCH 2/5] kvmtrace: make cycle calculation architecture aware

2008-07-09 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Hollis Blanchard wrote: On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 15:56 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The current implementation of kvmtrace uses always a 64 bit cycle variable, but get_cycles() which is used to fill it is "unsigned long" which

Re: kvmtrace?

2008-07-07 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
age to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Grüsse / regards, Christian Ehrhardt IBM Linux Technology Center, Open Virtualization -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message

[PATCH] kvmtrace: fix "Remove use of bit fields in kvm trace structure" patch

2008-07-03 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
[PATCH] kvmppc: kvmtrace: fix "Remove use of bit fields in kvm trace structure" From: Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The current patch kvm_trace_nobitfields.diff in the kvmppc.hg-dev repo doesn't compile and has some minor flaws. This patch is known to the kvm