On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:53:25AM +0800, lidong chen wrote:
> because of some other work, i could not focus on this problem last month.
>
> now i find the wrong vaule of isr cause this problem.
> in function vp_interrupt, the isr is 0, and the virtio_balloon pci
> device have 10 times initerr
because of some other work, i could not focus on this problem last month.
now i find the wrong vaule of isr cause this problem.
in function vp_interrupt, the isr is 0, and the virtio_balloon pci
device have 10 times initerrupts. then IRQ #11 disabled.
static irqreturn_t vp_interrupt(int irq,
On 02/15/2011 10:26 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
QAPI and QMP
- Anthony adding a new wiki page to describe all of this
http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/QAPI
- specified in formal schema using JSON
- includes documenation in javadoc-like syntax
- can generate api (possibly protocol) docs
On 02/15/2011 11:11 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Any device we expose to the user through -device needs to maintain a
compatible interface forever. For our own sanity, I think we should try to
expose as little as possible.
Restrictin
On 02/15/2011 01:54 PM, Erik Rull wrote:
David Mair wrote:
I have currently virtualized two partitions (/dev/sda2 and /dev/sda3)
that are exposed as QEMU Harddisks to the Windows XP Guest (Drive C and
D there).
Are there possibilities to convert or adapt those to native partitions
or native di
David Mair wrote:
I have currently virtualized two partitions (/dev/sda2 and /dev/sda3)
that are exposed as QEMU Harddisks to the Windows XP Guest (Drive C and
D there).
Are there possibilities to convert or adapt those to native partitions
or native disks so that I could theoretically boot the
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 04:42:16PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Short-circuit an STI; HLT sequence while an interrupt is pending:
> instead of halting, re-entering the guest, and exiting immediately
> on an interrupt window exit, go directly to the last step.
>
> Saves a vmexit on workloads where in
On 02/15/2011 10:06 AM, Erik Rull wrote:
Hi all,
I have currently virtualized two partitions (/dev/sda2 and /dev/sda3)
that are exposed as QEMU Harddisks to the Windows XP Guest (Drive C and
D there).
Are there possibilities to convert or adapt those to native partitions
or native disks so that
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:35:54AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Drop base_address from the vmstate, upstream decided against managing it
> at device level. Continuing to interpret the vmstate field would break
> compatibility with upstream. Instead, fetch the base addres from the
> sysbus device stat
Hi Marcelo,
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 18:16, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 03:03:40PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 02/13/2011 04:07 AM, Ruben Kerkhof wrote:
>> >And tonight we had another one of those errors we had a few weeks ago:
>> >
>> >2011-02-13T02:56:28.694496+01:00 phy0
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 03:03:40PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/13/2011 04:07 AM, Ruben Kerkhof wrote:
> >And tonight we had another one of those errors we had a few weeks ago:
> >
> >2011-02-13T02:56:28.694496+01:00 phy005 kernel: EPT: Misconfiguration.
> >2011-02-13T02:56:28.694908+01:00 phy0
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 02/14/2011 03:25 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>
>> I'd still like to have the inline wrapper over the factory interface,
>> probably with similar signature to isa_serial_new. Then there would be
>> two functions, one going through qdev and th
On 2011-02-15 17:44, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 03:11:28PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> The goal of this document shall be
>> - overview of all locks used in KVM core
>> - provide details on the scope of each lock
>> - explain the lock type, specifically of a raw spin locks
>>
On 02/15/2011 06:44 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 03:11:28PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
The goal of this document shall be
- overview of all locks used in KVM core
- provide details on the scope of each lock
- explain the lock type, specifically of a raw spin locks
- provide a
Hi all,
I have currently virtualized two partitions (/dev/sda2 and /dev/sda3) that
are exposed as QEMU Harddisks to the Windows XP Guest (Drive C and D there).
Are there possibilities to convert or adapt those to native partitions or
native disks so that I could theoretically boot the Windows t
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 03:11:28PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> The goal of this document shall be
> - overview of all locks used in KVM core
> - provide details on the scope of each lock
> - explain the lock type, specifically of a raw spin locks
> - provide a lock ordering guide
>
> Start with one
QAPI and QMP
- Anthony adding a new wiki page to describe all of this
- specified in formal schema using JSON
- includes documenation in javadoc-like syntax
- can generate api (possibly protocol) docs
- documenting each command and expected errors
- creates marshalling functions and C interfa
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 02/14/2011 11:56 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
>>
>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>
>
> -rc2 is tagged and waiting for announcement. Please take a look at -rc2 and
> make sure there is nothing critical mis
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Thomas Broda wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:19:23 +, Stefan Hajnoczi
> wrote:
>
>> Did you run dd with O_DIRECT?
>
>> dd if=/dev/zero of= oflag=direct bs=64k
>
> Using O_DIRECT, performance went down to 11 MB/s on the hypervisor...
Hmm...can you restate tha
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 16:41 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > +static int kvm_register_steal_time(void)
> > +{
> > + int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > + int low, high, ret;
> > + struct kvm_steal_time *st =&per_cpu(steal_time, cpu);
> > +
> > + if (!hypervisor_steal_time)
> > +
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 17:17 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> Ah, so we're all set. Do you know if any user tools process this
> information?
I suppose there are, I bet Jeremy knows, Xen after all supports this
stuff ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body
On 02/15/2011 05:24 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
On 02/15/2011 10:17 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
Ah, so we're all set. Do you know if any user tools process this
information?
Top and vmstat have been displaying steal time for
maybe 4 or 5 years now.
Excellent, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
On 02/15/2011 10:17 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
Ah, so we're all set. Do you know if any user tools process this
information?
Top and vmstat have been displaying steal time for
maybe 4 or 5 years now.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to major
On 02/15/2011 04:45 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 16:35 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 02/11/2011 08:19 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
This patch accounts steal time time in kernel/sched.
I kept it from last proposal, because I still see advantages
in it: Doing it here will give us eas
On 02/11/2011 08:19 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
This patch accounts steal time time in kernel/sched.
I kept it from last proposal, because I still see advantages
in it: Doing it here will give us easier access from scheduler
variables such as the cpu rq. The next patch shows an example of
usage for
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 16:35 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/11/2011 08:19 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > This patch accounts steal time time in kernel/sched.
> > I kept it from last proposal, because I still see advantages
> > in it: Doing it here will give us easier access from scheduler
> > variab
On 02/11/2011 08:19 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
Register steal time within KVM. Everytime we sample the steal time
information, we update a local variable that tells what was the
last time read. We then account the difference.
+static int kvm_register_steal_time(void)
+{
+ int cpu = smp_pro
On 02/11/2011 08:19 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
To implement steal time, we need the hypervisor to pass the guest information
about how much time was spent running other processes outside the VM.
This is per-vcpu, and using the kvmclock structure for that is an abuse
we decided not to make.
In this
On 02/11/2011 08:19 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
To implement steal time, we need the hypervisor to pass the guest information
about how much time was spent running other processes outside the VM.
This is per-vcpu, and using the kvmclock structure for that is an abuse
we decided not to make.
In this
On 2011-02-15 13:32, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 12:55:39PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Only for walking the list of VMs, we do not need to hold the preemption
>> disabling kvm_lock. Convert stat services, the cpufreq callback and
>> mmu_shrink to RCU. For the latter, special c
On 02/15/2011 03:58 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/15/2011 04:44 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 02/15/2011 12:18 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/14/2011 11:56 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
-rc2 is tagged and waiting for announcement. Pl
On 02/15/2011 06:11 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Anthony Liguori writes:
On 02/14/2011 11:56 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
- QAPI and QMP events
- qdev future
Do we need a qdev tree and a maintainer for
On 02/15/2011 04:44 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 02/15/2011 12:18 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/14/2011 11:56 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
-rc2 is tagged and waiting for announcement. Please take a look at
-rc2 and make sure there is
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 11:10:57PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> From: Jan Kiszka
>
> qemu-kvm does not (yet) have CONFIG_IOTHREAD enabled. Without it,
> kvm_check_many_ioeventfds will always fail although there is no reason.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
> ---
> kvm-all.c |2 +-
> 1 files ch
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 12:55:39PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Only for walking the list of VMs, we do not need to hold the preemption
> disabling kvm_lock. Convert stat services, the cpufreq callback and
> mmu_shrink to RCU. For the latter, special care is required to
> synchronize its list_move_ta
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 01:54:41PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 02/14/2011 11:56 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
> >Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>
> - QAPI and QMP events
> - qdev future
>
Making new Seabios stable release for qemu-0.14?
--
Anthony Liguori writes:
> On 02/14/2011 11:56 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>
>
> - QAPI and QMP events
> - qdev future
Do we need a qdev tree and a maintainer for it?
>
> I don't really have a coherent plan for the second on
On 02/15/2011 12:18 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/14/2011 11:56 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
-rc2 is tagged and waiting for announcement. Please take a look at
-rc2 and make sure there is nothing critical missing. Will tag 0.14.0
On (Mon) 14 Feb 2011 [16:18:10], Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 02/14/2011 11:56 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
> >Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>
> -rc2 is tagged and waiting for announcement. Please take a look at
> -rc2 and make sure there is nothing critical missing.
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:19:23 +, Stefan Hajnoczi
wrote:
> Did you run dd with O_DIRECT?
> dd if=/dev/zero of= oflag=direct bs=64k
Using O_DIRECT, performance went down to 11 MB/s on the hypervisor...
--
Thomas
--
ICQ: 7122237
Jabber: t...@bassfimass.de
Web:www.bassfimass
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Thomas Broda wrote:
> dd'ing /dev/zero to a testfile gives me a throughput of about 400MB/s when
> done directly on the hypervisor. If I try this from within a virtual guest,
> it's only 19MB/s to 24MB/s if the guest is on the LVM volume (raw device,
> not qcow2 or
On 02/14/2011 07:28 PM, Nicholas Thomas wrote:
I'm interested in getting the changes merged upstream, so I thought I'd
get in early and ask if you'd be interested in the patch, in principle;
whether the old behaviour would need to be preserved, making the new
behaviour accessible via a config opt
Reorder mcg_status in CPUState to achive automatic clearing on reset.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
CC: Huang Ying
CC: Hidetoshi Seto
CC: Jin Dongming
---
target-i386/cpu.h|3 ++-
target-i386/helper.c |2 --
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-i386/cp
There is nothing to abstract here. Fold kvm_setup_mce into its caller
and fix up the error reporting (return code of kvm_vcpu_ioctl holds the
error value).
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
CC: Huang Ying
CC: Hidetoshi Seto
CC: Jin Dongming
---
target-i386/kvm.c | 11 ---
1 files changed, 4
And the show goes on: This 4th round contains a rework of the MCE
handling, mostly for KVM, but also few bits used in emulation mode are
affected. Major contributions are:
- fixed MCE injection race with other events
- kick VCPU out of halt on asynchronous MCEs
- unified TCG and KVM MCE injectio
MCEs can be injected asynchronously, so they can also terminate the halt
state.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
CC: Huang Ying
CC: Hidetoshi Seto
CC: Jin Dongming
---
target-i386/exec.h | 15 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-i386/exec.h b/targe
The current way of injecting MCE events without updating of and
synchronizing with the CPUState is broken and causes spurious
corruptions of the MCE-related parts of the CPUState.
As a first step towards a fix, enhance the state writeback code with
support for injecting events that are pending in
Allow to tell cpu_x86_inject_mce that it should ignore Action Optional
MCE events when the target VCPU is still processing another one. This
will be used by KVM soon.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
CC: Huang Ying
CC: Hidetoshi Seto
CC: Jin Dongming
---
monitor.c|7 +--
target-i
As this service is used by the human monitor, make sure that errors get
reported to the right channel, and also raise the verbosity.
This requires to move Monitor typedef in qemu-common.h to resolve the
include dependency.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
CC: Huang Ying
CC: Hidetoshi Seto
CC: Jin Don
This switches KVM's MCE injection path to cpu_x86_inject_mce, both for
SIGBUS and monitor initiated events. This means we prepare the MCA MSRs
in the VCPUState also for KVM.
We have to drop the MSRs writeback restrictions for this purpose which
is now safe as every uncoordinated MSR injection is r
Pure function suffling to avoid multiple #ifdef KVM_CAP_MCE sections,
no functional changes. While at it, annotate some #ifdef sections.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
CC: Huang Ying
CC: Hidetoshi Seto
CC: Jin Dongming
---
target-i386/kvm.c | 346 ++
Fix some code style issues, use proper headers, and align to cpu_x86
naming scheme. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
CC: Huang Ying
CC: Hidetoshi Seto
CC: Jin Dongming
---
cpu-all.h|4
monitor.c|2 +-
target-i386/cpu.h|5 +
targ
There is no reason to continue if the kernel claims to support MCE but
then fails to process our request.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
CC: Huang Ying
CC: Hidetoshi Seto
CC: Jin Dongming
---
target-i386/kvm.c | 30 +-
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-
From: Huang Ying
qemu_ram_remap() unmaps the specified RAM pages, then re-maps these
pages again. This is used by KVM HWPoison support to clear HWPoisoned
page tables across guest rebooting, so that a new page may be
allocated later to recover the memory error.
[ Jan: style fixlets ]
Signed-of
From: Huang Ying
In Linux kernel HWPoison processing implementation, the virtual
address in processes mapping the error physical memory page is marked
as HWPoison. So that, the further accessing to the virtual
address will kill corresponding processes with SIGBUS.
If the error physical memory p
This is required to support keeping VCPU states across a system reset.
If we do not read the current state before the reset,
cpu_synchronize_all_post_reset may write back incorrect state
information.
The first user of this will be MCE MSR synchronization which currently
works around the missing cp
56 matches
Mail list logo
