On Monday, November 24, 2014 01:03:17 PM James Cain wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> > Almost all but not quite everyone agrees that KDE PIM should be renamed to
> > Kontact.
>
> From a user-standpoint, I agree 100 pct. KDE PIM as a name is a tad bland,
> and
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> Almost all but not quite everyone agrees that KDE PIM should be renamed to
> Kontact.
From a user-standpoint, I agree 100 pct. KDE PIM as a name is a tad bland,
and I don't think it necessary for a suite of applications to be formally
> Almost all but not quite everyone agrees that KDE PIM should be renamed to
> Kontact.
I dissagree. KDE PIM is (or can be) used for a lot more than just Kontact. I
don't think that a set
of libraries and applications should be renamed to the main application
(application collection)
that uses
On Saturday, November 22, 2014 05:26:22 PM Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> Kolab Sys have branches of KDE PIM 4.13 used by their customers called
> "enterprise". Currently they package this through Fedora packages with
> debian/rules added on top.
>
> They want to get these branches upstream in KDE and
Kolab Sys have branches of KDE PIM 4.13 used by their customers called
"enterprise". Currently they package this through Fedora packages with
debian/rules added on top.
They want to get these branches upstream in KDE and would like them
packaged in a PPA for everyone's sanity.
Kubuntu should be
