> If you have a complaint that someone is violating the CoC, then you know how
> to deal with it. While it may not be phrased in the most welcoming manner, I
> personally don't find it particularly inaccurate.
>
> I certainly object to CC members attempting to persecute people by attempting
>
On Saturday, July 18, 2015 12:45:40 PM cprofitt wrote:
> > If you have a complaint that someone is violating the CoC, then you know
> > how to deal with it. While it may not be phrased in the most welcoming
> > manner, I personally don't find it particularly inaccurate.
> >
> > I certainly object
On Saturday, July 18, 2015 12:45:40 PM cprofitt wrote:
> > If you have a complaint that someone is violating the CoC, then you know
> > how to deal with it. While it may not be phrased in the most welcoming
> > manner, I personally don't find it particularly inaccurate.
> >
> > I certainly object
On Sat, 2015-07-18 at 13:59 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Saturday, July 18, 2015 12:45:40 PM cprofitt wrote:
> > > If you have a complaint that someone is violating the CoC, then you know
> > > how to deal with it. While it may not be phrased in the most welcoming
> > > manner, I personally
On Saturday, July 18, 2015 02:38:55 PM cprofitt wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-07-18 at 13:59 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Saturday, July 18, 2015 12:45:40 PM cprofitt wrote:
> > > > If you have a complaint that someone is violating the CoC, then you
> > > > know
> > > > how to deal with it. While
On Sat, 2015-07-18 at 18:13 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Saturday, July 18, 2015 02:38:55 PM cprofitt wrote:
> > I read a great deal over information that hits the planet and if it
> > contains links to content in other places I usually try to read that as
> > well. I took the time to write t
Charles,
I don't believe anything I said was inaccurate and yes I did use profanity
but as its been explained to me profanity in and of itself is not a
violation of the Code of Conduct. That said this remark was made on a
third-party site not subject to the Ubuntu Code of Conduct but that values
f
Ben:
A few responses to yours.
On Sat, 2015-07-18 at 16:42 -0700, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> Charles,
>
> I don't believe anything I said was inaccurate and yes I did use
> profanity but as its been explained to me profanity in and of itself
> is not a violation of the Code of Conduct. That said
Charles,
A few responses to your responses.
> Ben:
> A few responses to yours.
>On Sat, 2015-07-18 at 16:42 -0700, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> Charles,
>
> I don't believe anything I said was inaccurate and yes I did use
> profanity but as its been explained to me profanity in and of itself
> is no
On Sat, 2015-07-18 at 21:02 -0700, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> 1. Then why bring this up in a governance boars public mailing list?
> Why not email me privately? I thought the CC defaulted to private
> conversations (now your confusing me).
1. This was a communication from me, not the CC.
2. I beli
10 matches
Mail list logo
