Thanks for linking to the changelog, indeed intentional and controlled.
Gladly those metapackage dependencies are only recommends.
But will they be cleaned up one day?
Probably not too important, certainly not to block on.
Ack to the case.
Removing packages from oracular:
digikam 4:8.3.0
I'm adding a task for ubuntustudio-meta to update the digikam
architectures.
** Also affects: ubuntustudio-meta (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to digikam in Ubuntu.
https://b
** Changed in: ubuntustudio-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: ubuntustudio-meta (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Erich Eickmeyer (eeickmeyer)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to digikam in Ubun
** Changed in: ubuntustudio-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to digikam in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078273
Title:
Please remove digikam from NBS architec
This bug was fixed in the package ubuntustudio-meta - 24.10.13
---
ubuntustudio-meta (24.10.13) oracular; urgency=medium
* Refreshed dependencies
* Removed digikam from photography-recommends [ppc64el] (LP: #2078273)
-- Erich Eickmeyer Tue, 03 Sep 2024 07:34:39
-0700
** Chang
