Very good. Good engineering logic and purpose. This is one for the achieves.
When thinking about engines.
KRRon
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 8:11 PM
Subject: RE: KR>These 7 things: Auto vs Aero Engines for Aircraft
> Serge and Colin and KRNetters,
> I have really resisted hitting
ay, January 12, 2004 7:56 AM
Subject: Re: KR>These 7 things: Auto vs Aero Engines for Aircraft
> Very good. Good engineering logic and purpose. This is one for the
achieves.
> When thinking about engines.
>
> KRRon
>
> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 8:11 PM
> Subject
lf Of
David Mikesell
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 7:41 PM
To: Ron Eason; KRnet
Subject: Re: KR>These 7 things: Auto vs Aero Engines for Aircraft
Well the crank shaft on a auto engine in most cases is supported by the use of
a reduction drive to get the maximum efficencyand I don't see ho
s/homepage
- Original Message -
From: David Mikesell
To: Ron Eason ; KRnet
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 12:40
Subject: Re: KR>These 7 things: Auto vs Aero Engines for Aircraft
Well the crank shaft on a auto engine in most cases is supported by the use
of a reduction dri
How many of you know that Subaru started designing and building aircraft and
Aero engines before they started to make cars??
Gavin
Australia
> Well the crank shaft on a auto engine in most cases is supported by the
use of a reduction drive to get the maximum efficencyand I don't see
aru engine was born from a REAL aircraft engine.
Alex
-Original Message-
From: krnet-boun...@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-boun...@mylist.net] On Behalf Of
Gavin Donohoe
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 1:48 AM
To: KRnet
Subject: Re: KR>These 7 things: Auto vs Aero Engines for Aircraft
Ho
Serge and Colin and KRNetters,
I have really resisted hitting the reply button...But
I feel now is as good a time as any to reply on this
subject.
There are profound General Design differences between
automobile engines, and aeronautical engines. Which
make these engines very application specific.
7 matches
Mail list logo
