Those Taylor’s don’t look like 28’ firewall to tail to me?? 😳
Larry H
> On Oct 18, 2019, at 12:03 PM, Oscar Zuniga via KRnet
> wrote:
>
> Donald wrote-
>> Just for comparison my Taylor mono plane is 28.5' to the back of fire wall
>> and 103.5" to the front of tail post from front of main root
Donald wrote-
>Just for comparison my Taylor mono plane is 28.5' to the back of fire wall
>and 103.5" to the front of tail post from front of main root spar. Measured
>from datum line at the bottom of fire wall to tail post.
Some Netters on this list may not recognize the connection here, but it's
7;t intersect the floor so my measurement
> rearward
> > goes the floor cross member of the so-called "Bulkhead "N"
> > Note: width of the N133RM main spar is 2 1/2"not the 2 11/32" dimension
> in
> > the KR2S drawing sheet W-1 titled "Sp
> Note: width of the N133RM main spar is 2 1/2"not the 2 11/32" dimension in
> the KR2S drawing sheet W-1 titled "Spar Details" - relatively small variance
> but noted...
>
> John Bouyea
> N133RM KR-2S
> OR81/ Hillsboro, OR
>
> -Original Message---
On 10/16/2019 9:56 AM, n357cj via KRnet wrote:
I have been on this net for at least 20 years now and I can't even think of how many times
lengthing has been discussed. So many times the answer was "add a bay". I really thought
this is heading for trouble for someone someday. adding a 14" bay to
e 2 11/32" dimension in
the KR2S drawing sheet W-1 titled "Spar Details" - relatively small variance
but noted...
John Bouyea
N133RM KR-2S
OR81/ Hillsboro, OR
-Original Message-
Subject: Re: KR> fuselage dimensions
Snip...
>>... I have been on this net for at least
r many years to come.
Thanks guys
Joe Horton
----- Original Message -----
Subject: KR> fuselage dimensions
Hello Guys,
Below is a copy of a post I did in Feb of 2016 and again now because of the on
going confusion of terms. I have about 12 sets of numbers form folks on the
net. But as I had said
Hello Guys,
Below is a copy of a post I did in Feb of 2016 and again now because of the on
going confusion of terms. I have about 12 sets of numbers form folks on the
net. But as I had said in follow up messages that year I would like to have
many more flying or not. I choose the foreward face o
blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px
#715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white
!important; } Those dimensions are spinner to tail correct?
Keep your Airspeed Up,
Dennis S. Lacy
On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 19:42, A
Thanks Larry!
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 23, 2017, at 6:58 PM, Larry Flesner via KRnet
> wrote:
>
> At 07:05 PM 2/22/2017, you wrote:
>> Anyway to tell which fuselage I have by dimension?
>
>
> The KR2 is 14' 6". The 2s is 16 inches longer. Any
At 07:05 PM 2/22/2017, you wrote:
Anyway to tell which fuselage I have by dimension?
The KR2 is 14' 6". The 2s is 16 inches longer. Anything longer than
that is , well, something else.
Larry Flesner
__
Joe
I used all 14' of the longeron material from Wicks as suggested by Mark
Langford. Mine measures 28" (2'4") to the front face of the firewall from the
front face of the fwd spar. From the front face of the fwd spar to the aft face
of the bottom of the stern post, I measured 141" (11'-9"). I a
"Duncan of Devonport" wrote:
> I know this question has been asked already, but I'm still uncertain about
> this... Basically, I have three questions:
You're right, this has been answered several times, but I can see how
searching the archives for it might be tedious. And since nobody else has
It is a much simpler build to make the sides straight than taper
top to bottom, Virg
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 22:17:00 -0400 (Eastern Standard Time) "Dan Heath"
writes:
> RE: Is there any fundamental or aesthetic reason why the cockpit
> should be
> wider at the top than at the bottom?
>
>
Hi there,
I know this question has been asked already, but I'm still uncertain about
this... Basically, I have three questions:
Question 1
I have a set of KR2-S plans, which as we know has an extra bay added to the
KR2 plans (ie lengthened by 14" aft of the cabin). Based on best practice
as e
RE: Is there any fundamental or aesthetic reason why the cockpit should be
wider at the top than at the bottom?
If your butt is the same width as your shoulders, then why not make it
streight? However, I don't think it would look as good and would also cause
it to have more frontal area. If I w
16 matches
Mail list logo
