Specifications state 8-16" aft of the inboard wing leading edge.
For N64KR, the CG range is 8" to 14" aft of the inboard wing leading edge.
This is because it is generally accepted that the aft 2" are a dangerous
place to be.
I hope that answers your question as I don't have it in relation to th
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: KRnet [mailto:krnet-bounces at list.krnet.org] On Behalf Of jon kimmel
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 10:59 AM
>> To: KRnet
>> Subject: Re: KR> cg question...
>
r, front or rear face.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Gary
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: KRnet [mailto:krnet-bounces at list.krnet.org] On Behalf Of jon kimmel
> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 10:59 AM
> To: KRnet
> Subject: Re: KR>
Where is the KR2 design gross weight most forward cg in relation to the
spar, front or rear face.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: KRnet [mailto:krnet-bounces at list.krnet.org] On Behalf Of jon kimmel
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 10:59 AM
To: KRnet
Subject: Re: KR>
35% MAC is a very common aft cg limit...from 707s to cessna 150s. To get
any more accurate you would have to know exactly the point where you don't
need any download on your elevator/stabilizer. Of course the longer and
narrower your wings are the smaller and further forward your MAC moves.
Once
Does anyone have a dimension location in relation to the rear side of the
main spar for the cg using the 5048 wing?
Thanks,
Gary
I have been looking at my new plans for a couple of weeks, and thinking
about building a 'simple' KR, as light as possible.
First, is it conceivable that the CG would be forward enough with a KR2S
built light to the following specs?:
-1835 engine, hand start, no electrics, Great Plains mount
-nos
You do not have to be concerned about the balance as you can move the engine
forward if you need to.
I think that scratch built is lighter, if you are good at it. If you are not
so good at it and have to do a lot of filling and re-work, then I think that
the premolds are lighter.
See N64KR at ht
I think that premolds are lighter, Virg
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:09:48 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time) "Dan Heath"
writes:
> You do not have to be concerned about the balance as you can move the
> engine
> forward if you need to.
>
> I think that scratch built is lighter, if you are good at
Eric,
Alot depends upon the builder, I built my own turtledeck, and although my
fuselage was 3 inches wider than plans, my turtledeck weighed half as much as
the RR pre-molded part.
you can see how I constructed mine at:
http://www.kr-builder.org/ScottCable/index.html
My turtledeck isn't what y
10 matches
Mail list logo
