Have you ever seen how much people mass Marty has put in his? I have seen
many flown way over the design specs.
See N64KR at http://KR-Builder.org - Then click on the pics
There is a time for building and a time for FLYING and the time for building
has expired.
Daniel R. Heath - Columbia, SC
Se
Dan Said;
Have you ever seen how much people mass Marty has put in his? I have
seen
many flown way over the design specs.
And I want to ask, did he CARRY them, or how many G's did he pull?
Note that if the DESIGN is good for 6g's, it'll LIKELY pull 9+ before
failure on a one time test, but
>And I want to ask, did he CARRY them, or how many G's did he pull?
I've seen him fly well over 1300 pounds (and heard of 1400 lbs), AND
register 6g's on his g-meter, all in the same flight. At the Gatherings he
regularly gives rides to anybody that will fit, and regularly pulls close to
6 g'
I've seen him fly well over 1300 pounds (and heard of 1400 lbs), AND
register 6g's on his g-meter, all in the same flight.
+
Do we know if he built a stock spar? RAF 48 I presume?
Steve J
Mark and all, I think we are all missing the point here. The original =
design
limits went out the door the moment anything other than a VW 60 HP got
attached to the nose. Spars are now laminated, fuselages are starched =
and
widened and have been reinforced more than anything Ken could have =
imag
I can't guarantee it, but I do believe that your presumption is correct.
See N64KR at http://KR-Builder.org - Then click on the pics
There is a time for building and a time for FLYING and the time for building
has expired.
Daniel R. Heath - Columbia, SC
See you in Mt. Vernon - 2005 - KR Gat
net
Subject: RE: KR> aircraft have been flown to the published limits
I can't guarantee it, but I do believe that your presumption is correct.
See N64KR at http://KR-Builder.org - Then click on the pics
There is a time for building and a time for FLYING and the time for
building
7 matches
Mail list logo
