NetHeads,
I should have waited for a 59 degree day, but it was pretty much gorgeous this
afternoon, so I flew the 52x60 Sterba prop on the new 3100cc engine for the
first time today. Although I didn't really plan it, I did a 0' AGL to 7500'
climb test, then leveled off at 7500' for a wide op
p.
Fred Johnson
Reno, NV
-Original Message-
From: krnet-boun...@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-boun...@mylist.net] On
Behalf Of Mark Langford
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 7:35 PM
To: KRnet
Cc: Corvair engines for homebuilt aircraft
Subject: KR> Sterba prop data vs Sensenich
NetHeads,
I should hav
air engines for homebuilt aircraft
Subject: KR> Sterba prop data vs Sensenich
NetHeads,
I should have waited for a 59 degree day, but it was pretty much gorgeous
this afternoon, so I flew the 52x60 Sterba prop on the new 3100cc engine for
the first time today. Although I didn't really pla
alf Of Bob Lee
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 11:40 AM
To: 'KRnet'
Subject: RE: KR> Sterba prop data vs Sensenich
Mark,
Since it seems that your prop is a little too steep in ptich perhaps you
should give an old trick a try: Climb out to 200 feet above your test
altitude and level off.
There is a time for building and a time for FLYING and the time for Flying
has begun.
Daniel R. Heath - Lexington, SC
---Original Message---
From: Brian Kraut
List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org
Date: 04/06/07 20:29:29
To: b...@flyboybob.com; KRnet
Subject: RE: KR> Sterba prop data vs Sensen
Dan said: I have, and it definitely works. The difficulty is that you must
not then
try to climb again, and I have always had a hard time not doing that. I
used to do it in my KR, and I have done in a C-150.
The reason most people fly slow this way is because of an old way of
teaching flying whe
6 matches
Mail list logo
