KR> Rebuilding Wings/tube tanks

2008-10-12 Thread Larry&Sallie Flesner
> I bought (4) 5 ft. pieces for the job thinking I could put (2) > side by side in each wing and interconnected at the ends but alas I > thing the aft one must not exceed 4-1/2 inch OD because of the > reduction in wing thickness as you move back so check carefully. >Don Lively +++

KR> Rebuilding Wings/tube tanks

2008-10-12 Thread John
Maybe I missed it or something. What about the slosh factor? I mean if all four tubes are half full, isin't that setup capable of generating some problems with balance? Are there some kind of baffles in the tubes? jg

KR> Rebuilding Wings/tube tanks

2008-10-12 Thread Larry&Sallie Flesner
At 10:50 AM 5/27/2007, you wrote: >What about the slosh factor? I mean if >all four tubes are half full, isin't >that setup capable of generating some >problems with balance? > >Are there some kind of baffles in the >tubes? > >jg >+++ Yes, you would pr

KR> Rebuilding Wings/tube tanks

2008-10-12 Thread Ronald Wright
None of the Yankee series aircraft use baffling in their tubular tanks. They are almost 6" diameter and over 8' long.. No slosh problem. Ron --- Larry&Sallie Flesner wrote: > At 10:50 AM 5/27/2007, you wrote: > >What about the slosh factor? I mean if > >all four tubes are half full, isin't

KR> Rebuilding Wings/tube tanks

2008-10-12 Thread D Lively
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2007 12:03 PM Subject: Re: KR> Rebuilding Wings/tube tanks > None of the Yankee series aircraft use baffling in > their tubular tanks. They are almost 6" diameter and > over 8' long.. No slosh problem. > > Ron > > > --- Larry&

KR> Rebuilding Wings/tube tanks

2008-10-12 Thread Gary Sprunger
Responding to Flesner questioning slosh in tube used fo tank and Ron Wright response about the American Yankee which used a 6" tube @8' long. That is correct about the Yankee and also the BD-4. Gary E. Sprunger KR2, KBEH> > > ___> Search the KRnet Archives at

KR> Rebuilding Wings/tube tanks

2008-10-12 Thread bob
Gary Sprunger wrote: >Responding to Flesner questioning slosh in tube used fo tank and Ron Wright >response about the American Yankee >which used a 6" tube @8' long. > >That is correct about the Yankee and also the BD-4. > > The BD-4 does use a 6.8" tubular wing spar, but it doesn't hold any f

KR> Rebuilding Wings/tube tanks

2008-10-12 Thread D Lively
aerodynamics. - Original Message - From: "bob" To: "KRnet" Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2007 7:07 PM Subject: Re: KR> Rebuilding Wings/tube tanks > Gary Sprunger wrote: > &g

KR> Rebuilding Wings/tube tanks

2008-10-12 Thread bearlk...@aol.com
Larry, I own an AA1 and it most definately does have baffles. The slosh factor is still so important that the airplane is labeled " no spins" more than three rotations and the fuel is forced through the baffles to the wing tips. This starves the engine while increasing the spin rate. Pilot funer