My KR2 was flyable when i bought it!!! but i took it all apart and did some
repairs and had the engine rebuilt changed the retracts to fixed !!
basically built a new plane!!! im going to sell it when its all done,my
question is, should i sell it as a new plane and let the new owner get a
airwor
My thought is that unless the buyer can get a repairman certificate for the
plane, which he can't, then there is no point to have to go through the full
certification process and fly off the 40 hours and bear the additional
expense. If you fly off the 5 hours required after a major change, and do
In South Africa it will add value if it is already registered even if it
is an old number.
- Original Message -
From: "randy white"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 9:33 AM
Subject: KR> Question about airworthy certificate
> My KR2 was flyable
&P) to do the annual inspection.
I'm sure someone will chime in here, if I'm wrong.
Ed
Ed Janssen
mailto:ejans...@chipsnet.com
- Original Message -
From: "randy white"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 1:33 AM
Subject: KR> Question about airworthy cert
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Url:
http://mylist.net/private/krnet/attachments/20070214/c345e800/attachment.bat
Don't forget to notify the insurance company of the upgrades and return to
phase 1 testing either, if something does go afoul they won't cover you for the
mishap.
Ed Larsen
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Url:
http://mylist.net/private/krnet/attachments/20070214/ddcf5107/attachment.bat
Ed Larsen wrote:
> Don't forget to notify the insurance company of the upgrades and return to
> phase 1 testing either, if something does go afoul they won't cover you
> for the
> mishap.
I heard the story of the guy swapping carburetors and having his insurance
voided (even though he eventuall
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Url:
http://mylist.net/private/krnet/attachments/20070214/aea677d4/attachment.bat
Wow!!! In my last conversations with the local FSDO I got the impression
that they wish homebuilt would go away. First they assigned one guy to do
all the airworthiness inspections in his region and now they have appointed
DAR's. My experience tells me without asking that if the aircraft is
ce
s. Do any or all
of the above require a form 337 and or going back to test phase # 1? How
about a sun visor that enhances safety of flight?
Mike Turner
Jackson Mo
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Scott"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: KR> Que
k Langford"
To: "KRnet"
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 10:35 AM
Subject: Re: KR> Question about airworthy certificate
> Ed Larsen wrote:
>
> > Don't forget to notify the insurance company of the upgrades and return
to
> > phase 1 testing either, if
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Url:
http://mylist.net/private/krnet/attachments/20070214/d4b6c050/attachment.bat
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Url:
http://mylist.net/private/krnet/attachments/20070214/4d88eb86/attachment.bat
rtified (have airworthiness
certificates).
Ed
Ed Janssen
mailto:ejans...@chipsnet.com
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Scott"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 1:59 PM
Subject: Re: KR> Question about airworthy certificate
> I would still ask myself the same question.
Jeff Scott is right on about home built aircraft.Just use common sense and
the adage if they don't ask they really don't want to know.I believe that
according to the FAR's if you rebuild or replace a engine you do fall back
into the test phase.But that is not a bad thing.It is a good idea on a f
e.
Ed
Ed Janssen
mailto:ejans...@chipsnet.com
- Original Message -
From:
To: "KRnet"
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 12:44 PM
Subject: Re: KR> Question about airworthy certificate
> What about changes to the inst panel that would "enhance the safety of
> flig
jscott.pi...@juno.com writes:
I would still ask myself the same question. If this was a certified
plane, would the FAA require a 337.
>
That is probably the best statement for decision making I've heard.
As far as the FSDO and the insurance companies are concerned, it's jus
ngalt@mylist.net]On Behalf Of
aviato...@charter.net
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 1:44 PM
To: KRnet
Subject: Re: KR> Question about airworthy certificate
What about changes to the inst panel that would "enhance the safety of
flight" say adding a x-ponder, a radio or nav upgrade, or a
I think it was detail by John Yodice, chief counsol AOPA, in their
magazine a few years back...
-dave
Mark Langford wrote:
>Ed Larsen wrote:
>
>
>
>>Don't forget to notify the insurance company of the upgrades and return to
>>phase 1 testing either, if something does go afoul they won't cover
20 matches
Mail list logo
