>Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 14:57:50 -0500
>From: "Colin & Bev Rainey"
>Subject: KR> Parachute
>Common sense might say that it does, but the letter of the FAR says each
occupant must wear a >personal parachute, and a reserve chute, etc
>No it does not. Ballistic chute is viewed like a fire exting
+banks would be considered aerobatics.
David Mikesell
23597 N. Hwy 99
Acampo, CA 95220
209-609-8774
skyguy...@skyguynca.com
www.skyguynca.com
- Original Message -
From: "Wesley Scott"
To: "krnet"
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 9:58 PM
Subject: KR> Parachute FAR
>
wesley scott said
k...@spottedowl.biz
I would interpret that to mean that if you are flying solo there is no
requirement to wear a parachute when doing aerobatics.
I think that is exactly correct. Also, imagine two persons in a KR
wearing 'chutes. Probably couldn't get out. Anyone serious
List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 06:12:55 -0500
From: "Colin & Bev Rainey"
Subject: KR> Parachutes
>Not to talk down or belittle anyone, but read closely what the wording is:
each occupant shall That means anyone on board pilot included. No
exception is made to while sol
Maybe my instructor did not know what he was doing, but I took a 5 hour
course in aerobatics in a Citabria and neither of us wore a parachute. I
was just reading that FAR yesterday and should have cut out the part about
this stuff. It, along with the rest of them, is a hard FAR to understand.
Se
5 matches
Mail list logo
