hi stef, thanks. I really am interested to make a 3-blade solution on
my upcoming built\d. yes the "coolness factor" is at play. In other
words, Unless there were a compelling reason (significant performance
loss, or whatever engine I choose would be damaged), I'd pay extra for
that third blade.
Hi,
I was also in a doubt between the 2 or 3 bladed prop.
In europe there are severall BMW1200 planes. The have tested the combination 2
or 3 blades. All with the same lengt.
2 blades vs 3 blades
*2 blades have a Slidly more vibration
*2 blades some more noice
*3 blades more performance in
Lycoming! Heated carbs are all the rage.
> On April 15, 2018 at 3:20 PM Kayak via KRnet wrote:
>
>
> Just contemplating engine choices. An O-200 I believe requires quite a
> large prop diameter. Are there three (or four) blade options that
> would reduce this while maintaining the general eff
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 1:20 PM
From: "Kayak via KRnet"
To: KRnet
Cc: Kayak
Subject: KR> O-200 prop options
Just contemplating engine choices. An O-200 I believe requires quite a
large prop diameter. Are there three (or four) blade options that
would reduce this while ma
Just contemplating engine choices. An O-200 I believe requires quite a
large prop diameter. Are there three (or four) blade options that
would reduce this while maintaining the general efficiency of a long
two blade?
-3854
From: KRnet on behalf of Kayak via KRnet
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2018 2:20 PM
To: KRnet
Cc: Kayak
Subject: KR> O-200 prop options
Just contemplating engine choices. An O-200 I believe requires quite a
large prop diameter. Are there three (or four) blade options that
would reduce th
Just contemplating engine choices. An O-200 I believe requires quite a
large prop diameter. Are there three (or four) blade options that
would reduce this while maintaining the general efficiency of a long
two blade?
___
Search the KRnet Archives at http
7 matches
Mail list logo
