Thanks to all who provided me some insite into the KR LSA questions that I had.
I believe my best choice and best bet for getting into the air under the LSA
rules would be to go with a plane like the Sonex or the 601XL.
I do still like the KRs though (also the corvair power plant) and it might
Kenny:
The Zenith 601 HD is a good choice. I have visited & toured their facility in
Mexico MO as it is only about 120 miles from where I live. Additionally it is
possible to upgrade it to a higer speed version by just building
HDS outer wing panels that will up the max speed to 150 mph. Zena
I have a friend who is close to completing a 601. Personally, I don't like it.
That center, flip over stick, looks like it could really be a problem. The
plane is big and looks bulky. It costs as much as an RV. All the parts did
not fit well. This guy has completed 4 RVs and this was a rea
ar : krnet-bounces+serge.vidal=sagem@mylist.net
05/05/2006 15:06
Veuillez répondre à KRnet
Remis le : 05/05/2006 15:07
Pour : KRnet
cc :(ccc : Serge VIDAL/DNSA/SAGEM)
Objet : KR> LSA KR-Thanks!
I have a friend who is close to completing a 601. Personall
Hello all,
Is anyone out there in KR land considering (or now building) a KR2 that would
meet the qualifications for LSA certification? I made a search of the archives
but there didn't seem to be a lot there as far as LSA and KRs go.
I am also considering the Sonex. I just want to be sure bef
...@att.net
List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org
Date: 2006/05/02 Tue AM 06:30:52 CDT
To: kr...@mylist.net
Subject: KR> LSA KR
Hello all,
Is anyone out there in KR land considering (or now building) a KR2 that would
meet the qualifications for LSA certification? I made a search of the archives
At 07:01 AM 5/2/2006, you wrote:
>I made a search of the archives but there didn't seem to be a lot
>there as far as LSA and KRs go.
>Kenny
>+++
I went to the following site, which is listed at the bottom of every
e-mail, an
HERE WE GO AGAIN, Virg
On Tue, 02 May 2006 11:30:52 + af...@att.net writes:
> Hello all,
>
> Is anyone out there in KR land considering (or now building) a KR2
> that would meet the qualifications for LSA certification? I made a
> search of the archives but there didn't seem to be
Kenny::
I have taken over a KR2 project and am kind of "Rolling the Dice" on this one.
The craft must meet of couse meet all of the requirements of the "Sport Plane"
catagory. The most difficult to achieve of these to meet is the
construction of the craft so that its top speed "clean" in level
Hi Don, Where did you getthe AirCalc program and how much did it cost?
i would like to try it, I don't think its a big deal to redesign the KR
to be an LSA and call it something else.
sincerely
Jim
On Tue, 02 May 2006 09:54:42 -0500 D F Lively
writes:
> Kenny::
>
> I have taken over a KR2 proj
At 07:30 AM 5/2/06, you wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>Is anyone out there in KR land considering (or now building) a KR2
>that would meet the qualifications for LSA certification? I made a
>search of the archives but there didn't seem to be a lot there as
>far as LSA and KRs go.
After today's spate o
Sorry, didn't mean that last post to go to the list :-(
Regards,
RonB
Thanks , I was loking for that.
Jim
On Tue, 02 May 2006 12:15:21 -0400 Ron Butterfield
writes:
> Sorry, didn't mean that last post to go to the list :-(
>
>
> Regards,
> RonB
>
>
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at
> http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.
Kenny:
I downloaded it from the net for the best price of all--- Free! Just type
in "AirCalc" into your search engine and I thik you will find it. I
stumbled on it it while looking for ways to to lower the stall speed of
wings using L.E. slots/slats. I think I have the back up for it as well.
How about the KR-1b, Virg
On Tue, 02 May 2006 12:14:29 -0400 Ron Butterfield
writes:
> At 07:30 AM 5/2/06, you wrote:
> >Hello all,
> >
> >Is anyone out there in KR land considering (or now building) a KR2
>
> >that would meet the qualifications for LSA certification? I made a
>
> >s
At 03:56 PM 5/2/06, VIRGIL N SALISBURY wrote:
> How about the KR-1b, Virg
Ran the numbers, 45hp stock 1600, 800lb, 91sf,
Airfoil is funny; center is RAF48 (CL 1.42), outer wings start as
GAW(2) (CL 2.04) tapering to GAW(1) at tip (CL 1.8). Rough average CL of 1.76
Stall 44Top spee
Ron:
I do not think spoilers results count because LSA stipulates stipulates "CLEAN"
which means that the deployment of lift destroying devices or any device that
alters the wing geometry is unacceptable to meet the requirement. That is why
I
looked at L.E. Slots/Slats but could not find anythi
AM
To: KRnet
Subject: Re: KR> LSA KR
Ron:
I do not think spoilers results count because LSA stipulates stipulates
"CLEAN"
which means that the deployment of lift destroying devices or any device
that alters the wing geometry is unacceptable to meet the requirement.
That is why I
Kruyssen
> Cairns, Australia
> k...@bigpond.com
> http://www.users.bigpond.com/kr2/kr2.htm
>
> -Original Message-
> From: krnet-boun...@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-boun...@mylist.net] On Behalf
> Of D F Lively
> Sent: Wednesday, 3 May 2006 8:48 AM
> To: KRnet
> Subje
19 matches
Mail list logo
