Mark
Thanks for the advice. I have studied your webpages for some time now
and it is clear you have good experience!
Regards
Deon
On 13/01/2017 02:18, Mark Langford via KRnet wrote:
Virg wrote:
> Pitch sensitivity is an overblown item, Virg
Now that I have put over 1100 hours on a KR2S, a
Virg wrote:
> Pitch sensitivity is an overblown item, Virg
Now that I have put over 1100 hours on a KR2S, and almost 300 on a KR2,
I feel qualified to say that there is a pretty large difference in pitch
stability between the two. Yes, the KR2 is entirely controllable, but
then mine is flown
Pitch sensitivity is an overblown item, Virg
On 1/12/2017 10:42 AM, Deon-tsrc via KRnet wrote:
Hi Virgil
The KR2 apparently suffers from too much pitch sensitivity.
Later designs resulted in the KR2S which has a longer fuselage length
increasing the moment arm of the tail. An
Hi Virgil
The KR2 apparently suffers from too much pitch sensitivity.
Later designs resulted in the KR2S which has a longer fuselage length
increasing the moment arm of the tail. Another idea was too increase the
surface area of the horizontal stabilizer (see Mark Langford's
discussion about
What pitch sensitivity ? Virg
On 1/12/2017 1:47 AM, Deon-tsrc via KRnet wrote:
Good day
I was thinking that in the process I should reduce pitch sensitivity by
enlarging the tail area as well. So removing the aft spar of the
horizontal stabilizer and install a longer one.
Good day
I have a partially completed KR2 (original design) which i bought some
time ago. I need to complete the landing gear (removed the original
retracted type & replace with fixed), engine and instrument panel &
electrics. While hangered the elevator was basically destroyed when
someone d
6 matches
Mail list logo
