3 weeks.
--- On Tue, 11/4/08, John Gotschall wrote:
From: John Gotschall
Subject: Re: KR> Flying milkstools and idiots
To: "KRnet"
List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org
Date: Tuesday, November 4, 2008, 7:48 PM
I haven't seen any mention of it, so I'll mention it: For those o
I have never taken offence to the nose vs. tail wheel before but
your tone is absolutely arrogant
I do take offence to your comments.
MY view is opposite to yours but I would never say what you did to anyone on
this list
Phil Matheson
SAAA Ch. 20 http://www.saaa20.org/
VH-
I haven't seen any mention of it, so I'll mention it: For those of us
who live near alot of water, retracts are best for a water landing, or
perhaps landing on frozen cornfields (john S. did that), probably for a
muddy field too.
jg
N611GB
Puyallup WA
I probably hand out as much ribbing about airplane training wheels and such as
anyone, and 8 of the 9 planes I have owned so far have been tail draggers;
However I have to agree with Joe here. If a guy want's a nose gear on his
plane cause that's what he's comfortable with, then by all means, h
Oh, and to have been more thorough in looking at both sides, the taildragger
is always trying to run off the runway (in a minor way) as opposed to being
naturally more directionally stable on the ground, but that's never bothered
me (yet). Another angle is that if the nose gear breaks you will
I have to agree with Joe, it is an opinion. I think the taildragger looks a
little "old timey", and is so low to the ground that it looks small...not
confidence inspiring to those who are afraid of flying (not that I care).
The tri-gear looks like a more substantial airplane because it's up off
BOY AM I GLAD THAT THIS IS JUST AN OPINION. Because it surly not a fact,
N357CJ had a true airspeed of 183,6 mph @ 450 MSL the other night at 6
gph- I have never taken offence to the nose vs. tail wheel before but
your tone is absolutely arrogant
Joe Horton
Joe Horton, Coopersburg, PA.
joe.kr2s.bui
7 matches
Mail list logo