Has anyone done any stress analysis on the outer main spar built to the
dimension on the early plans that showed the outer end at 5 ½ instead of 5 ¼ .
When trimmed down to the wing tip airfoil thickness the spar cap height is 7/16?
on top and bottom. I have found this to be the case with my sp
Allen H Burr wrote:
> Has anyone done any stress analysis on the outer main spar built to the
> dimension on the early plans that showed the outer end at 5 ½ instead of 5
> ¼ .
If you already know that there are plenty of KRs flying this way, where is
the problem? Personally I wouldn't give it
What airfoils are you going to use?
Regards
Myron (Dan) Freeman
Indpls, Ind. 46203 USA. Home of
2007 World Champion Indpls, Colt's
mfreem...@indy.rr.com
Posted - Tuesday, 03/06/07 9:10 am
I was thinking of using the AS5046 airfoil which takes more of the spar caps
than the RAF48 by virtue of the more extreme angles. The original plans only
differ in dimension at the wing tip end, so that when shaved to size the largest
discrepancy is at the outer most end having the least load.
Hi Allen
I choose the AS5046 airfoil also. I stripped the RAF48 wings down to the
bare spars and I'm rebuilding them.
Regards
Myron (Dan) Freeman
Indpls, Ind. 46203 USA. Home of
2007 World Champion Indpls, Colt's
mfreem...@indy.rr.com
Posted - Wednesday, 03/07/07 8:49 am
5 matches
Mail list logo