Geez, it comes down to this; does one single bolt and spacer weigh less than
two?!!
>
Where is all this stuff coming from? I got plans for a KR-1 in the mid
seventies
and have never herd of a wing failer on a KR>
Jim
- Original Message
From: Glenn Martin
To: KRnet
Sent: Sat, October 2, 2010 9:49:57 PM
Subject: Re: FW: KR> KR2 ARTICLE-KITPLANES NOV 2010
Hi Glenn
Yeh. I think you did but I don't just what :-)
I'm pretty sure a bolt in double shear apparently is proportionately
stronger than two single ones in single shear of the same dia. I presume the
Australian authorities knew what they were on about when they insisted on
thisbut then agai
Pete wrote:
>It's the addition of the tube spacer that adds the strength not the
> length of the bolt. What it effectively does is take an area that has
> two potential failure modes and replaces it with one.
> Cheers.
>
O k..but that is not SHEAR STRENGTH we're talking about, and I cant se
It's the addition of the tube spacer that adds the strength not the
length of the bolt. What it effectively does is take an area that has
two potential failure modes and replaces it with one.
Cheers.
Peter Bancks.
Ballina, Oz.
On 3/10/2010 12:49, Glenn Martin wrote:
> I can see how a thicker
John Martindale wrote:
> A long time ago before "experimental" came along (like in the 1980s), the
> Australian authorities did mandate a change to the bolt arrangement that
> specified a spacer tube between each pair of WAFs and a longer single
> through bolt instead of two short independent bolts
Hi Mark
A long time ago before "experimental" came along (like in the 1980s), the
Australian authorities did mandate a change to the bolt arrangement that
specified a spacer tube between each pair of WAFs and a longer single
through bolt instead of two short independent bolts.
I think this ref
7 matches
Mail list logo
