Awsome!
Thanks for all the inputs!
I will retain the current configuration. One of the things I really
liked is the simple fuel qty indicator - see through pipe!
I am glad that the CoG shift would not be a problem and the tank should
be much safer during crashing. I do not expect to fly for
Hi Guys
The partial KR2 (original design) I have bought is fitted with an
aluminum fuel tank in front of the instrument panel. From the
information I have available this is not a good idea (shift of CoG, fire
danger etc.)
Would you advise that I ditch this and create wing tanks? Given all th
Mark
Thanks for the advice. I have studied your webpages for some time now
and it is clear you have good experience!
Regards
Deon
On 13/01/2017 02:18, Mark Langford via KRnet wrote:
Virg wrote:
> Pitch sensitivity is an overblown item, Virg
Now that I have put over 1100 hours on a KR2S, a
2017 15:55, Virgil N. Salisbury via KRnet wrote:
What pitch sensitivity ? Virg
On 1/12/2017 1:47 AM, Deon-tsrc via KRnet wrote:
Good day
I was thinking that in the process I should reduce pitch sensitivity by
enlarging the tail area as well. So removing the aft spar of the
horizontal
Good day
I have a partially completed KR2 (original design) which i bought some
time ago. I need to complete the landing gear (removed the original
retracted type & replace with fixed), engine and instrument panel &
electrics. While hangered the elevator was basically destroyed when
someone d
5 matches
Mail list logo
