KR>Re: KR2 C of G range.

2021-05-10 Thread Chris Pryce
The safe thing to do is test your CG range with moveable ballast. I initially operated in the recommended 6 inch range. I decided to test and expand that range with moveable weights. I've successfully tested my range to 6.75 inches aft using 100 lbs of rocks in the seat and 30 pounds of weights tha

KR>Re: Trainer idea

2021-05-10 Thread Kayak
would adding a BRS to a trainer KR add a margin of safety against the CG issue when slow flight training (at altitude of course) ? (remember the solo pilot who spun his all the way down and never recovered, all caught on gopro) On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 5:05 AM MS wrote: > I very much agree with

KR>KR2 C of G range.

2021-05-10 Thread colin hales
I read recently that a KR2 pilot was worried about "stuffing a 2nd std pilots in a KR." There is no need to worry about stuffing any payload onboard a KR2 if the aircraft remains within the C of G range. That is what the C of G range is for after all. In the UK we did extensive tests of aircra

KR>Re: Trainer idea

2021-05-10 Thread n357cj via KRnet
Hi Mike, I just wanted to comment to make sure that your referring to a KR2 in all the comments. My experience in my 2S and a couple others I have been in has been all good. I have well over a hundred hours of XC with passengers. I fondly remmeber one passenger from the Kentky gathering that fl

KR>Trainer idea

2021-05-10 Thread MS
I very much agree with the idea of not stuffing two people in a KR for training purposes.  My previous standard KR was WAY out of CG with just two normal-sized people in it and my KR wasn't badly built - an engineer with McDonnell Douglas built it - built three of them in fact - and had the adde