Larry Flesner wrote:
> The 2S with larger tail surfaces might handle that area
> without a problem but that is not something I'm confirming here.
Richard Mole did an analysis back in 1998, where he determined that the
KR2S had a slightly better CG range than the KR2.you get another
0.4" af
Several weeks back we discussed the plans given CG range for the KR2. I
gave the location from memory but don't recall it being confirmed.
I brought my plans home from the hangar today and looked it up. As
stated in the plans on page 114, 16.1 / Weight and Balance.
( CG range is 15-35% of
2 matches
Mail list logo
