>I would like to say that the AS5048 spar size conformed the KR
>advertised 9 G rating more accurately
>than the RAF48 size.
> guentheraviator at yahoo.com
I don't recall ever seeing the KR rated at 9G. My plans say "
I think it's more about the strain and moment on the wing attach fittings
than the spar strength itselfbut both are bloody strong anyhow.
John Martindale
29 Jane Circuit
Toormina NSW 2452
Australia
ph:61 2 6658 4767
m:0403 432179
email:john_martindale at bigpond.com
web site: http://john-mart
I don't have a KR, but still thinking of attending.
Gary
Tulsa
43 Days until the gathering and only 20 people have registered, this will make
it?tuff for Larry.
Eric Pitts
Terre Haute, Ind.
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving
safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in
sideways, chocol
I would like to say that the AS5048 spar size conformed the KR advertised 9 G
rating more accurately
than the RAF48 size.
?
guentheraviator at yahoo.com
-
> Strength is not my limiting factor...the @as5048 has about a 25% increase
> in strength alone due to the taller spar sections...add on to
5 matches
Mail list logo