NetHeads,
Here are two messages I fished out of the KRnet archive from 2001. I just
killed an hour sifting through that whole conversation. Quite interesting.
For those interested, this thread will take you off the streets for a few
days. I remember it well!
Richard Mole is a good friend an
Adam,
I got all my wood from AS&S two years ago and it came to just above $2000.
On 8/15/2013 7:35 PM, Adam Tippin wrote:
> Does this look fair.
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet,
Need to post a correction on the G limit.
I looked it up in the KR manual. It is +- 7 G at 800 pounds.
To be specific on CG range, per the KR manual it states 15 - 35% of wing cord,
or 8 -16" aft of the leading edge for the KR2 wing.
I won't argue the points being made by others on the real
...
Name: cg vs planform.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 71423 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://list.krnet.org/mailman/private/krnet_list.krnet.org/attachments/20130816/57a24931/attachment.jpg>
I agree with that assessment...the point I was trying to make is that it
doesn't appear that the mac was ever recalculated for the kr2s. The mac in
the plans are for the kr2not the kr2s. What makes matters worse is I
tried to recreate the mac in the plans and couldn't get it to correlate so
I
The aft two inches of the CG range for KR2 or KR2S is a danger zone. Early
fliers realized this and sent out the warning via the Newsletter, but
Richard Mole, English Aeronautical Engineer, studied it in detail and I
believe his comment was something like "I hope nobody's tried to fly it
like
Hello all,
I have recently joined this august group due to my purchase of a KR2 (frame #
2001). I have fitted a new motor (Jabiru 2200 85hp), repaired and tweaked the
overall airframe to ensure it is airworthy. I have now flown it for 7.5hrs and
have decided the aircraft has many characteris
7 matches
Mail list logo
