Actually Mark mentioned or a small 'snip' of previous email.Which is
exactly what the last two emails were? & Funny besides :-)
CL-Tim
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 22:48
Subject: KR> Flying Milkstools
And why are you Luddites with the tender
And why are you Luddites with the tender egos still re-posting
everything. Weren't Mark's instructions clear enough?
I swear, ten year olds do better.
Mike
Buying a home? Click here for free information on find the home of your drea
"your tone is absolutely arrogant"
Oh calm down. Taking offense at a tongue in cheek proclamation doesn't
say much for your security level.
Mike
Click here to become a professional counselor in less time than you think.
http://thirdp
I haven't seen any mention of it, so I'll mention it: For those of us
who live near alot of water, retracts are best for a water landing, or
perhaps landing on frozen cornfields (john S. did that), probably for a
muddy field too.
jg
N611GB
Puyallup WA
I have a Todds canopy and was very happy with the service and quality of the
canopy. I cracked the canopy while installing it and todd sole me the second at
his cost to produce it.
Jack Cooper
- "Robert K Pesak" wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
> I just got off the phone with Todd of Todd's Canopies.
Hi Knetters,
A couple of people have expressed an interest in the Dragonfly canopy fitting a
standard KR2, so i took a couple more photos in the daylight so It might be
easier to see.> > Well. I did it. I cut up that expensive Dragonfly canopy.
To see the results, see the web page.> > > >
Hi Everyone,
I just got off the phone with Todd of Todd's Canopies. If Anyone has any
comments on his product or service please let me know. It sounded like he could
ship it as soon as he received my check.
--
Robert K Pesak
rkp...@bellsouth.net
I probably hand out as much ribbing about airplane training wheels and such as
anyone, and 8 of the 9 planes I have owned so far have been tail draggers;
However I have to agree with Joe here. If a guy want's a nose gear on his
plane cause that's what he's comfortable with, then by all means, h
Oh, and to have been more thorough in looking at both sides, the taildragger
is always trying to run off the runway (in a minor way) as opposed to being
naturally more directionally stable on the ground, but that's never bothered
me (yet). Another angle is that if the nose gear breaks you will
Hello Netters,
I am selling my KR-2 with standard retractshas B2180 revmaster dual
ignition with approx 20 hours, the plane has never flown, has reg # n64635,
with plans and some documents , the plane was built by Jim Terpstra, which he
never had the opportunity to fly the KR-2... unfortunat
I have to agree with Joe, it is an opinion. I think the taildragger looks a
little "old timey", and is so low to the ground that it looks small...not
confidence inspiring to those who are afraid of flying (not that I care).
The tri-gear looks like a more substantial airplane because it's up off
BOY AM I GLAD THAT THIS IS JUST AN OPINION. Because it surly not a fact,
N357CJ had a true airspeed of 183,6 mph @ 450 MSL the other night at 6
gph- I have never taken offence to the nose vs. tail wheel before but
your tone is absolutely arrogant
Joe Horton
Joe Horton, Coopersburg, PA.
joe.kr2s.bui
Looks, Speed, money, and adding something else that can break your plane.
The KR has to be the easiest conventional gear airplane that there is to fly
It is so easy that even I can do it.
See N64KR at http://KRBuilder.org - Then click on the pics
See you at the 2008 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon
Well, it isn't the cover of the Rolling Stone, but I am sure it is the
closest that I will ever get. For a few biased pics of the 2008 KRGathering
and the article that made the cover of the Chapter Newsletter, go to
http://krbuilder.org/KRGathering2008/index.html and click on the link on the
last
14 matches
Mail list logo
