---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6312/
---
(Updated Jan. 15, 2011, 11:13 a.m.)
Review request for Kopete.
Changes
---
> On Jan. 10, 2011, 7:19 p.m., Frank Schaefer wrote:
> > When disabling of the video part is cleaned up / fixed, you can simplify
> > your patch a lot:
> >
> > Just do
> >
> > if ( NOT DISABLE_VIDEOSUPPORT )
> > find_package(Jasper)
> > macro_log_feature(...)
> > endif
> >
> > in
> On Jan. 9, 2011, 6:02 p.m., Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> > The idea of not relying on an external process for this sounds good (it'd
> > be nice if you could look up our bugzilla and see if there's any bug report
> > related to this).
> >
> > The code still needs some work IMO. The files y
> On Jan. 12, 2011, 4:49 p.m., Frank Schaefer wrote:
> > Hmm... thinking about it for some minutes... the question is: how do we
> > define "video support disabled" ?
> > It's main purpose is to skip the video device part (doesn't compile on all
> > platforms, much code, additional dependencies
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6333/
---
Review request for Kopete.
Summary
---
a) seems like yahoo protocol doe
> On Jan. 12, 2011, 4:49 p.m., Frank Schaefer wrote:
> > Hmm... thinking about it for some minutes... the question is: how do we
> > define "video support disabled" ?
> > It's main purpose is to skip the video device part (doesn't compile on all
> > platforms, much code, additional dependencies
