On Saturday 09 January 2010 12:48:43 pm Frank Schaefer wrote:
> Matt Rogers schrieb:
> > On Sunday 03 January 2010 05:33:19 am Frank Schaefer wrote:
> >> The problem is, that (AFAIK) subversion isn't capable of creating
> >> offline patch-series.
> >> That's why I used git, which is usually not a p
Matt Rogers schrieb:
> On Sunday 03 January 2010 05:33:19 am Frank Schaefer wrote:
>
>> The problem is, that (AFAIK) subversion isn't capable of creating
>> offline patch-series.
>> That's why I used git, which is usually not a problem.
>> But for some unknown reasons, review-board doesn't accep
On Sunday 03 January 2010 05:33:19 am Frank Schaefer wrote:
> The problem is, that (AFAIK) subversion isn't capable of creating
> offline patch-series.
> That's why I used git, which is usually not a problem.
> But for some unknown reasons, review-board doesn't accept them (even
> after modifying t
Matt Rogers schrieb:
> On Sunday 03 January 2010 05:33:19 am Frank Schaefer wrote:
>
>> The problem is, that (AFAIK) subversion isn't capable of creating
>> offline patch-series.
>> That's why I used git, which is usually not a problem.
>> But for some unknown reasons, review-board doesn't accep
On Sunday 03 January 2010 05:33:19 am Frank Schaefer wrote:
> The problem is, that (AFAIK) subversion isn't capable of creating
> offline patch-series.
> That's why I used git, which is usually not a problem.
> But for some unknown reasons, review-board doesn't accept them (even
> after modifying t
