> On 2009-09-11 18:51:16, Matt Rogers wrote:
> > Let's get this patch committed for safety purposes. Users are seeing tons
> > of crashes at logout time, and if this can help fix it for them, then let's
> > go for it.
Actually I was not able to reproduce this problem anymore, I am not conforta
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/972/#review2297
---
Ship it!
Let's get this patch committed for safety purposes. Users are
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/972/#review1614
---
I'm really unable to reproduce this crash.
As far as I can see here, ko
> On 2009-07-10 13:11:54, Tiago Salem Herrmann wrote:
> > how many times were you able to reproduce this crash?
> > What was the interval between the two offline status requests?
> > I'm not sure if a race condition can happen here, because as far as I know
> > there are no threads running in th
> On 2009-07-10 13:11:54, Tiago Salem Herrmann wrote:
> > how many times were you able to reproduce this crash?
> > What was the interval between the two offline status requests?
> > I'm not sure if a race condition can happen here, because as far as I know
> > there are no threads running in th
> On 2009-07-10 13:11:54, Tiago Salem Herrmann wrote:
> > how many times were you able to reproduce this crash?
> > What was the interval between the two offline status requests?
> > I'm not sure if a race condition can happen here, because as far as I know
> > there are no threads running in th
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/972/#review1539
---
how many times were you able to reproduce this crash?
What was the inte
