As far as I can tell, call number handling is generally broken in 3.0, with
no realy standard for how to display call numbers. Some templates use
, some use , some use .
Which is correct, or is there a better way to handle call numbers in a more
generalized way?
-- Owen
--
Web Developer
Athen
Yeah, we cant use these variables in the templates, as what is in them is
controlled by sysprefs, ie itemcallnumber is going to be empty unless people
are using item level callnumbers
Its a tricky one as Nicole says, some libraries use dewey and LC .. so we
need to display both.
Chris
On 2/26/08
On 2/25/08, Chris Cormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, we cant use these variables in the templates, as what is in them is
> controlled by sysprefs, ie itemcallnumber is going to be empty unless people
> are using item level callnumbers
item-level callnumbers are really the only valid type of
