Hi,
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Andrew Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Ryan Higgins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Temporary files that get made by the build process like .patch or
> t/run may be OK for .gitignore. I'm not sure if I understood if
> leavi
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Ryan Higgins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd like to suggest that the .gitignore recently pushed to the public repo
> be removed,
> and that Koha not enforce any conventions via .gitignore .
Hi Ryan -
We chatted a bit about this on IRC, but I'm not sure if I un
MJ Ray a écrit :
> "Ryan Higgins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'd like to suggest that the .gitignore recently pushed to the public repo
>> be removed,
>> and that Koha not enforce any conventions via .gitignore .
>>
>
> I think this is a decision for QA (is it still Chris covering that
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 8:23 PM, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Ryan Higgins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd like to suggest that the .gitignore recently pushed to the public
> repo
> > be removed,
> > and that Koha not enforce any conventions via .gitignore .
>
> I think this is a decis
"Ryan Higgins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to suggest that the .gitignore recently pushed to the public repo
> be removed,
> and that Koha not enforce any conventions via .gitignore .
I think this is a decision for QA (is it still Chris covering that? I
found it mentioned on-list last Oc
