Hi to all,
reading the subject 'Koha Con 2009' I think that I need to write this message.
This year IFLA congress will be in Milan 23-27 August.
Many of you think to be here ?
I probably be one of the voluntairs.
If BibLime or some other buys a stand in the Exbion section, good
thing but it is q
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 2:04 AM, Henri-Damien LAURENT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Moore a écrit :
>> So far, they have consisted only of these emails I've been sending out
>> from git. They contain a "0" patch that contains no code, but just
>> documentation. Then the patches show the creat
Late entry, I know, but I would like to get rid of the clunky extra table,
and merge the columns that we need from biblioitems into a new biblio
table. I've listed the columns to keep on the wiki; please review and add
any that are missing.
http://wiki.koha.org/doku.php?id=en:development:rfcs3.2:
>> I donot want to slow down things. But I want to be sure that what we
>> choose is the best alternative to fit our requirements.
> Speed is definitely a major concern here ... and I believe it's one of
> the reasons that Koha originally wasn't written with an ORM. Andy, any
> thoughts about what
Joshua Ferraro wrote:
> Speed is definitely a major concern here ... and I believe it's one of
> the reasons that Koha originally wasn't written with an ORM. Andy, any
> thoughts about what this choice will mean w/respect to performance?
The use of mod_perl would speed things up by an order (and