Mason James a écrit :
> Hi folks
>
> Any objections to bumping the authorised_values.category column to
> say.. 20 chars??
>
> I'm having to make my new auth categories a little terse/cryptic
> because of the current 10 char limit
I think it's a good idea.
Another idea I have would be to add
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 3:20 AM, Paul POULAIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mason James a écrit :
>> Hi folks
>>
>> Any objections to bumping the authorised_values.category column to
>> say.. 20 chars??
>>
>> I'm having to make my new auth categories a little terse/cryptic
>> because of the cur
Hi,
I'm going to disagree with Galen here.
I prefer to expand an existing table rather than add another when
possible. This is because more tables adds to the complexity of the
database and the code. With your suggestion there would have to be
added left joins to a lot of authority code, where
I favor Galen's approach. I've always found the interface confusing
for adding a new auth_val category: you have to enter the category's
first authorised_value at the same time you create the category. This
is an artifact of the table design. While it adds a small bit of
complexity
short term t
Sorry, I am not as familiar with the authorized values tables as I
thought. From your message I understand that the category information
is in the same table with the values, which would not be proper
normalization.
I'll withdraw my previous comments then.
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 14:05 -0500, Ryan
Galen Charlton wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Rick Welykochy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Can someone with the knowledge point me in the right direction to getting
>> bulkmarcimport.pl working in Koha/3?
>
> Well, bulkmarcimport.pl is not terminally broken in Koha 3.0, as we
> use it a
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Rick Welykochy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Galen Charlton wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Rick Welykochy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Can someone with the knowledge point me in the right direction to getting
>>> bulkmarcimport.pl working in Koha/3?
>>
