Rick Welykochy a écrit :
> I am putting it down to differences between the Koha/2.2.9 tables and
> the Koha/3.0 tables. The only differences I can see are the charset
> used, i.e. Latin-1 vs utf8.
>
> Any ideas?
2nd difference : 2.2.9 has ISAM tables, where 3.0 has innoDB tables.
dunno if it's th
Paul POULAIN wrote:
> Rick Welykochy a écrit :
>> I am putting it down to differences between the Koha/2.2.9 tables and
>> the Koha/3.0 tables. The only differences I can see are the charset
>> used, i.e. Latin-1 vs utf8.
>>
>> Any ideas?
> 2nd difference : 2.2.9 has ISAM tables, where 3.0 has inn
Hi folks,
Well, September's here and I've still not been able to find the time to pull
together a new koha.org site based on Plone; too many other priorities have
gotten in the way. I still have it on my list and I'm optimistic that I
should be able to turn something around in the next couple week
This is certainly something I have heard several people ask for. I
personally like your option #1. I'm not sure why we'd need a system
preference for this though. Why wouldn't we just have an advanced
search form that lets you search the fields associated with patron
records?
---
Nicole C. En
"
Adding a system preference to customize the search form was just an idea to
make it easier for system administrators to customize some of the layout,
however, it might also be adding an unnecessary level of complexity to the
code. I agree with you Nicole, I think it is fine to setup a search
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Danny Bouman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adding a system preference to customize the search form was just an idea to
> make it easier for system administrators to customize some of the layout,
> however, it might also be adding an unnecessary level of complexit
