On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:19 AM, Bernard Shiundu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Don't know if it's just me but the label generator seems to be broken after
> I refreshed my code from git to version 3.00.00.074.The sample label
> templates are gone and after creating a template I the option to add i
Josh, you should already have 4 patches from me in queue to remedy these
(but probably not all) label problems. I spent a dozen or more hours
debugging this in support of our clients. I would be happy to do QA for
version 3.2's labels code, where I would expect a total overhaul.
--Joe Atzberger
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Joe Atzberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josh, you should already have 4 patches from me in queue to remedy these
> (but probably not all) label problems. I spent a dozen or more hours
> debugging this in support of our clients. I would be happy to do QA for
> v
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Eric Bégin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The main point of tagging a version as Beta is that features complete.
> This doesn't mean that there are no bugs. Beta versions still have
> bugs, knowned and unknowned. However, the goal of a development team is
>
Hi,
Various LibLime customers have requested the ability to have the
borrower record store additional IDs beyond the barcode and OPAC user
ID. To meet this requirement, we propose the following development,
which barring a general escape of zombies from the sewers of Chicago,
I could implement by
