Paul --
if the incoming date is -00-00, then the result is : 02/00/0, which is
> not really a date.
>
-00-00 is not really a date either, and certainly not ISO. Currently
the module notices, warns, but stops short of returning undef. (My earlier
versions were more strict about input.)
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Joshua Ferraro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Galen Charlton
> > Doing this would require going through a lot of code that uses
> > format_date(), of course. Also, I think we should remove usage of
> > "-00-00" to signif
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Galen Charlton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 5:30 AM, Paul POULAIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It seems that the C4::Dates::format_date function, has a small problem :
> > if the incoming date is -00-00, then the result is
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 5:30 AM, Paul POULAIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems that the C4::Dates::format_date function, has a small problem :
> if the incoming date is -00-00, then the result is : 02/00/0, which
> is not really a date.
> I think we should get a '' (nothing) in th
