Okey Dokey, all of the 3.4 RFCs have been moved to the new wiki:
http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/RFCs_for_Koha_3.4 -- please add
any that are missing there.
Nicole
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Galen Charlton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Nicole Engard wrote:
>> So, I
Hi,
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Nicole Engard wrote:
> So, I too ask what the procedure is - should we put them on the wiki &
> bugzilla? or just the wiki? or just bugzilla?
Both - the bugs database and the emailed RFCs and wiki serve slightly
different purposes:
* bugs database: complete
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Jane Wagner wrote:
> Re: "1. Specifications are published on Koha wiki in RFC section." in your
> message. At and after Kohacon last year, the general understanding for
> developers was that new development should be posted in bugzilla as
> enhancements instead of
te 200
Bethesda, MD 20817
(301) 654-8088 x 151
jwag...@ptfs.com
-Original Message-
From: koha-devel-boun...@lists.koha.org
[mailto:koha-devel-boun...@lists.koha.org] On Behalf Of Frederic Demians
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 1:21 AM
To: Chris Cormack
Cc: koha-devel
Subject: Re: [Koha-dev
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 1:20 AM, Frederic Demians wrote:
> Thanks a lot to PTFS for contributing back to Koha its customer's code.
Ditto from me!! It is awesome to see so many new developments made
public for all to benefit from.
[snip]
>
> This process would avoid having orphan functionalities
Thanks a lot to PTFS for contributing back to Koha its customer's code.
> I'm hoping that PTFS can help creating these branches, but anyone can
> do so at let me know where to pull from. They need to have the changes
> isolated if possible and be based on new_features. (Which at the
> moment tr
